PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLLX vs. URFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLLX vs. URFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) and USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TBLLX having a 12.50% return and URFRX slightly lower at 12.10%.


TBLLX

1D
1.12%
1M
1.26%
6M
8.38%
YTD
12.50%
1Y
23.05%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.99%

URFRX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.27%
6M
8.88%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
20.54%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
9.25%
ALL TIME*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TBLLX vs. URFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLLX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund
12.50%20.35%15.04%21.21%-18.10%4.24%
URFRX
USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund
12.10%17.49%10.37%16.75%-14.86%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLLX and URFRX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021

0.97

The correlation between TBLLX and URFRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLLX vs. URFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBLLX
TBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

URFRX
URFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
URFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
URFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBLLX vs. URFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) and USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBLLXURFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.19

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

13.66

-2.34

TBLLX vs. URFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the URFRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLLX and URFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBLLX vs. URFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLLX drawdown since its inception was -26.50%, smaller than the maximum URFRX drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLLX and URFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLLXURFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.50%

-39.33%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-6.88%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-12.41%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.50%

-22.27%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.40%

-5.15%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.60%

+0.60%

Volatility

TBLLX vs. URFRX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX) at 2.55%. This indicates that TBLLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLLXURFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

2.55%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

8.52%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

10.22%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

12.41%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

13.04%

+2.49%

TBLLX vs. URFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLLX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than URFRX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBLLX vs. URFRX - Dividend Comparison

TBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than URFRX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBLLX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund
2.20%2.47%1.92%1.72%1.96%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URFRX
USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund
6.29%7.05%2.78%3.94%10.68%7.78%5.49%12.74%9.99%6.53%3.95%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, TBLLX and URFRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TBLLX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to URFRX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLLX dropped -26.50% vs URFRX's -39.33%.

URFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLLX and URFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer