TBLLX vs. NVDA
TBLLX (T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund) is Target Retirement Date fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, TBLLX returned 9.95%/yr vs 59.45%/yr for NVDA. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
TBLLX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBLLX achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 13.78% return.
TBLLX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 23.05%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.99%
NVDA
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 17.67%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 68.13%
- 5Y*
- 59.45%
- 10Y*
- 64.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.92B | $26.18B | $31.86B | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TBLLX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLLX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund | 12.50% | 20.35% | 15.04% | 21.21% | -18.10% | 4.24% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 13.78% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 49.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBLLX and NVDA is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between TBLLX and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBLLX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
TBLLX
NVDA
TBLLX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBLLX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.11 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 0.89 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 1.80 | +9.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBLLX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBLLX drawdown since its inception was -26.50%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLLX and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBLLX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.50% | -89.72% | +63.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -20.21% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.11% | -36.88% | +20.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.50% | -66.34% | +39.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.99% | +9.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.40% | -36.06% | +29.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 9.95% | -7.75% |
Volatility
TBLLX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) is 3.73%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.46%. This indicates that TBLLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBLLX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 12.46% | -8.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 28.38% | -17.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 36.52% | -23.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 51.91% | -36.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 49.98% | -34.45% |
Dividends
TBLLX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
TBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than NVDA's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.13% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
TBLLX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund | 2.20% | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.72% | 1.96% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBLLX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (12.46%) compared to TBLLX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLLX dropped -26.50% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
TBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBLLX and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer