TBLJX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

TBLJX (T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 3 years, TBLJX returned 17.17%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for FRQHX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TBLJX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.

Performance

TBLJX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund (TBLJX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLJX achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 3.71% return.

TBLJX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: 8.80%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 21.11%
• 3Y*: 17.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FRQHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 3.71%
• 6M: 3.52%
• 1Y: 8.80%
• 3Y*: 7.44%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLJX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TBLJX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund	8.80%	18.81%	13.87%	20.14%	-17.93%	3.89%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.71%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLJX and FRQHX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021	0.75

The correlation between TBLJX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TBLJX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLJX

TBLJX Risk / Return Rank: 58
TBLJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
TBLJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TBLJX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TBLJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
TBLJX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FRQHX

FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLJX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund (TBLJX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBLJX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.26	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	3.27	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.45	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	2.88	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.56	12.04	-1.48

TBLJX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLJX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBLJX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLJX drawdown since its inception was -25.86%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLJX and FRQHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBLJX	FRQHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.86%	-16.90%	-8.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.63%	-3.41%	-5.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.55%	-5.15%	-9.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.03%	-0.41%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.40%	-3.77%	-2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	0.81%	+1.17%

Volatility

TBLJX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund (TBLJX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 2.04%. This indicates that TBLJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBLJX	FRQHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	2.04%	+2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.68%	3.70%	+5.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.66%	4.36%	+7.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	5.60%	+8.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.50%	5.77%	+8.73%

TBLJX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLJX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TBLJX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

TBLJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than FRQHX's 3.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.40%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%
TBLJX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund	2.37%	2.58%	2.05%	2.19%	1.97%	2.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBLJX and FRQHX in my portfolio?

TBLJX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBLJX or FRQHX?

TBLJX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to FRQHX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLJX dropped -25.86% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.