PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLJX vs. TRRDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLJX vs. TRRDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund (TBLJX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TBLJX having a 10.25% return and TRRDX slightly lower at 9.77%.


TBLJX

1D
-0.73%
1M
2.94%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.71%
1Y
24.25%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
10Y*

TRRDX

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.77%
6M
5.56%
1Y
17.41%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLJX vs. TRRDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund
10.25%18.81%13.87%20.14%-17.93%3.89%
TRRDX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund
9.77%12.53%13.15%19.60%-18.77%3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLJX and TRRDX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021

0.98

The correlation between TBLJX and TRRDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLJX vs. TRRDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLJX
TBLJX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TBLJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLJX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLJX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRDX
TRRDX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TRRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLJX vs. TRRDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund (TBLJX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLJXTRRDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.05

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

8.26

+4.40

TBLJX vs. TRRDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the TRRDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLJX and TRRDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLJXTRRDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.60

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.59

+0.05

Drawdowns

TBLJX vs. TRRDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLJX drawdown since its inception was -25.86%, smaller than the maximum TRRDX drawdown of -53.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLJX and TRRDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLJXTRRDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.86%

-53.50%

+27.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-8.88%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.55%

-14.03%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.63%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.46%

-6.54%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.18%

-0.24%

Volatility

TBLJX vs. TRRDX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund (TBLJX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLJXTRRDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.25%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

9.52%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

11.40%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

14.15%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

14.62%

-0.17%

TBLJX vs. TRRDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLJX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBLJX vs. TRRDX - Dividend Comparison

TBLJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, while TRRDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBLJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund
2.34%2.58%2.05%2.19%1.97%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRRDX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.26%5.60%8.92%7.92%4.96%6.10%9.51%3.96%3.36%4.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TBLJX and TRRDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TBLJX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to TRRDX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLJX dropped -25.86% vs TRRDX's -53.50%.

TBLJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLJX and TRRDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer