TBLGX vs. PRWCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TBLGX (T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund) and PRWCX (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund) are both mutual funds - TBLGX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while PRWCX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 3 years, TBLGX returned 14.65%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for PRWCX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TBLGX charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for PRWCX.

Performance

TBLGX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLGX achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's 6.04% return.

TBLGX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 2.74%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 6M: 8.88%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: 14.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRWCX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 6.04%
• 6M: 6.29%
• 1Y: 15.64%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: 11.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLGX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TBLGX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund	7.94%	15.49%	11.32%	16.91%	-16.41%	2.96%
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund	6.04%	12.45%	12.50%	18.85%	-12.00%	5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLGX and PRWCX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021	0.90

The correlation between TBLGX and PRWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TBLGX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLGX

TBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 66
TBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
TBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
TBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
TBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

PRWCX

PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 51
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLGX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBLGX	PRWCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.14	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	3.05	+0.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.40	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	2.55	+0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.37	11.23	+2.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TBLGX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLGX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBLGX	PRWCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.14	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.91	-0.28

Drawdowns

TBLGX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLGX drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLGX and PRWCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBLGX	PRWCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.25%	-41.77%	+18.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.69%	-6.32%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.81%	-15.96%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.16%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.85%	-3.33%	-2.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	1.44%	+0.05%

Volatility

TBLGX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 1.87%. This indicates that TBLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBLGX	PRWCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	1.87%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.68%	6.03%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.33%	7.46%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.39%	12.74%	-1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.39%	12.74%	-1.35%

TBLGX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLGX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBLGX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

TBLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than PRWCX's 8.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund	8.31%	8.81%	10.38%	4.15%	9.44%	9.23%	7.97%	5.83%	7.46%	6.82%	3.51%	9.86%
TBLGX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund	2.66%	2.87%	2.48%	2.21%	2.60%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBLGX and PRWCX in my portfolio?

TBLGX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBLGX or PRWCX?

TBLGX has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to PRWCX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLGX dropped -23.25% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.