PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLGX vs. FTLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLGX vs. FTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLGX achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly higher than FTLSX's 5.00% return.


TBLGX

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.06%
YTD
7.77%
6M
7.39%
1Y
18.43%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
10Y*

FTLSX

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.06%
YTD
5.00%
6M
4.95%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLGX vs. FTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund
7.77%15.49%11.32%16.91%-16.41%2.96%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
5.00%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLGX and FTLSX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021

0.75

The correlation between TBLGX and FTLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLGX vs. FTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLGX
TBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLGX vs. FTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBLGXFTLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.09

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.58

13.33

-0.75

TBLGX vs. FTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the FTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLGX and FTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBLGX vs. FTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLGX drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, which is greater than FTLSX's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLGX and FTLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLGXFTLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.25%

-15.74%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-3.65%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.81%

-4.83%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.28%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-2.80%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

0.84%

+0.68%

Volatility

TBLGX vs. FTLSX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) at 2.26%. This indicates that TBLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLGXFTLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.26%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

4.27%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

4.94%

+3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.40%

5.51%

+5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

4.81%

+6.59%

TBLGX vs. FTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLGX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLGX vs. FTLSX - Dividend Comparison

TBLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than FTLSX's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.52%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%
TBLGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund
2.67%2.87%2.48%2.21%2.60%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLGX and FTLSX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLGX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FTLSX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLGX dropped -23.25% vs FTLSX's -15.74%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLGX and FTLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer