PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLSX vs. TCLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLSX vs. TCLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLSX achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly higher than TCLTX's 5.00% return.


FTLSX

1D
0.67%
1M
1.35%
YTD
5.30%
6M
5.45%
1Y
11.51%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*

TCLTX

1D
0.61%
1M
1.36%
YTD
5.00%
6M
5.07%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
6.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTLSX vs. TCLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
5.30%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%9.04%10.97%-1.40%3.61%
TCLTX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund
5.00%12.09%8.17%11.68%-13.76%8.19%12.11%17.49%-5.43%4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLSX and TCLTX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.81

The correlation between FTLSX and TCLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLSX vs. TCLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TCLTX
TCLTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TCLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLSX vs. TCLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTLSXTCLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.42

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.72

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

11.81

+1.90

FTLSX vs. TCLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the TCLTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLSX and TCLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTLSX vs. TCLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLSX drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum TCLTX drawdown of -44.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLSX and TCLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLSXTCLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-44.15%

+28.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-5.01%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.83%

-6.99%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-18.99%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-5.19%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

1.15%

-0.31%

Volatility

FTLSX vs. TCLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) is 2.31%, while TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that FTLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLSXTCLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

2.47%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.25%

5.18%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.92%

6.23%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.50%

7.69%

-2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.81%

8.36%

-3.55%

FTLSX vs. TCLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TCLTX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTLSX vs. TCLTX - Dividend Comparison

FTLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than TCLTX's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.51%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%0.00%0.00%
TCLTX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund
4.27%4.49%3.33%2.38%5.36%7.49%4.91%3.36%6.53%2.44%5.09%4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FTLSX and TCLTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TCLTX has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to FTLSX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLSX dropped -15.74% vs TCLTX's -44.15%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLSX and TCLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer