PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLBX vs. FRQKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TBLBX vs. FRQKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TBLBX vs. FRQKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLBX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund
0.00%12.59%9.03%12.95%-13.37%1.38%
FRQKX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K
0.37%9.91%4.42%8.62%-12.30%0.04%

Returns By Period


TBLBX

1D
0.48%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
0.00%
6M
1.60%
1Y
10.76%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
10Y*

FRQKX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
0.37%
6M
1.35%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TBLBX vs. FRQKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLBX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQKX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TBLBX vs. FRQKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLBX
TBLBX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TBLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQKX
FRQKX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FRQKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLBX vs. FRQKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLBXFRQKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.69

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

2.36

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.39

-0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.50

9.32

-0.82

TBLBX vs. FRQKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FRQKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLBX and FRQKX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLBXFRQKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.69

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.70

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between TBLBX and FRQKX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TBLBX vs. FRQKX - Dividend Comparison

TBLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than FRQKX's 3.24% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TBLBX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund
3.41%3.41%3.18%2.23%3.92%1.86%0.00%0.00%
FRQKX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K
3.24%3.09%2.91%2.86%5.12%6.11%3.61%2.57%

Drawdowns

TBLBX vs. FRQKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLBX drawdown since its inception was -18.87%, which is greater than FRQKX's maximum drawdown of -16.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLBX and FRQKX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLBXFRQKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-16.97%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-3.42%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-2.34%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-3.95%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

0.88%

+0.45%

Volatility

TBLBX vs. FRQKX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) at 2.08%. This indicates that TBLBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TBLBXFRQKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

2.08%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.70%

2.96%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.77%

4.67%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.18%

5.52%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.18%

5.77%

+2.41%