PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLBX vs. LTFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLBX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLBX achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than LTFIX's 8.64% return.


TBLBX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.81%
YTD
5.68%
6M
5.48%
1Y
13.94%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
10Y*

LTFIX

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.44%
YTD
8.64%
6M
8.07%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLBX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLBX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund
5.68%12.59%9.03%12.95%-13.37%1.38%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.64%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLBX and LTFIX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2021

0.93

The correlation between TBLBX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLBX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLBX
TBLBX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TBLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLBX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBLBXLTFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.52

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.74

11.09

+1.65

TBLBX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLBX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBLBX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLBX drawdown since its inception was -18.87%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLBX and LTFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLBXLTFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-52.73%

+33.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-8.71%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.29%

-15.70%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.94%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-7.62%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.98%

-0.85%

Volatility

TBLBX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) is 2.47%, while Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that TBLBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLBXLTFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

4.84%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.38%

10.34%

-4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.44%

12.55%

-6.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.16%

15.57%

-7.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.16%

15.88%

-7.72%

TBLBX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLBX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLBX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

TBLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than LTFIX's 8.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.03%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%
TBLBX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund
3.22%3.41%3.18%2.23%3.92%1.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TBLBX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTFIX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to TBLBX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLBX dropped -18.87% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

TBLBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLBX and LTFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer