PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLBX vs. FHTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLBX vs. FHTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) and Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund Class K6 (FHTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLBX achieves a 5.87% return, which is significantly lower than FHTKX's 11.65% return.


TBLBX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.91%
YTD
5.87%
6M
6.57%
1Y
14.93%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
10Y*

FHTKX

1D
0.21%
1M
3.56%
YTD
11.65%
6M
13.63%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLBX vs. FHTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLBX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund
5.87%12.59%9.03%12.95%-13.37%1.38%
FHTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund Class K6
11.65%22.35%16.63%20.25%-18.08%2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLBX and FHTKX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021

0.93

The correlation between TBLBX and FHTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLBX vs. FHTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLBX
TBLBX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TBLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FHTKX
FHTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FHTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FHTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLBX vs. FHTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) and Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund Class K6 (FHTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLBXFHTKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

2.51

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.61

3.49

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.33

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.66

14.74

-1.08

TBLBX vs. FHTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FHTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLBX and FHTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLBXFHTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.51

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.77

-0.10

Drawdowns

TBLBX vs. FHTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLBX drawdown since its inception was -18.87%, smaller than the maximum FHTKX drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLBX and FHTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLBXFHTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-30.95%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-8.69%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.29%

-14.06%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-5.45%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.96%

-0.85%

Volatility

TBLBX vs. FHTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) is 2.00%, while Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund Class K6 (FHTKX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that TBLBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLBXFHTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

3.87%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.94%

9.42%

-4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.07%

11.49%

-5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.15%

14.39%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.15%

15.55%

-7.40%

TBLBX vs. FHTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLBX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FHTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBLBX vs. FHTKX - Dividend Comparison

TBLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than FHTKX's 6.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund Class K6
6.57%5.27%5.65%2.00%12.68%12.37%5.93%7.00%8.48%3.12%
TBLBX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund
3.22%3.41%3.18%2.23%3.92%1.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TBLBX and FHTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHTKX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to TBLBX (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLBX dropped -18.87% vs FHTKX's -30.95%.

TBLBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLBX and FHTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer