PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQKX vs. FFVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRQKX vs. FFVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQKX achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than FFVFX's 6.19% return.


FRQKX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.67%
YTD
3.66%
6M
3.65%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*

FFVFX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.37%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.12%
1Y
13.93%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
6.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQKX vs. FFVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRQKX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K
3.66%9.91%4.42%8.62%-12.30%3.95%9.68%3.94%
FFVFX
Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund
6.19%13.19%6.20%11.38%-14.63%7.31%12.46%5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQKX and FFVFX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FRQKX and FFVFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRQKX vs. FFVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQKX
FRQKX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FRQKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FFVFX
FFVFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FFVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FFVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQKX vs. FFVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRQKXFFVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

3.08

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.89

13.23

-1.34

FRQKX vs. FFVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FFVFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQKX and FFVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRQKX vs. FFVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQKX drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, smaller than the maximum FFVFX drawdown of -39.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQKX and FFVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQKXFFVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-39.04%

+22.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-4.69%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.17%

-6.75%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.97%

-20.44%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.24%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-4.30%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.09%

-0.27%

Volatility

FRQKX vs. FFVFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) is 2.02%, while Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that FRQKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRQKXFFVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

2.71%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.71%

5.52%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

6.42%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.60%

7.65%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.78%

7.68%

-1.90%

FRQKX vs. FFVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQKX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FFVFX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRQKX vs. FFVFX - Dividend Comparison

FRQKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than FFVFX's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFVFX
Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund
6.42%6.48%3.94%2.61%8.38%10.74%6.83%6.70%7.96%3.71%3.72%5.55%
FRQKX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K
3.42%3.09%2.91%2.86%5.12%6.11%3.61%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FRQKX and FFVFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFVFX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to FRQKX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQKX dropped -16.97% vs FFVFX's -39.04%.

FFVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRQKX and FFVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer