PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLA vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TBLA vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLA achieves a 19.74% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -4.15% return.


TBLA

1D
-1.08%
1M
16.70%
6M
29.58%
YTD
19.74%
1Y
52.07%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
-10.97%
10Y*

NEM

1D
0.51%
1M
-2.36%
6M
-12.19%
YTD
-4.15%
1Y
60.16%
3Y*
32.96%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLA vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLA
Taboola.com Ltd.
19.74%26.30%-15.70%40.58%-60.41%-29.53%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-4.15%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLA and NEM is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TBLA:

$1.51B

NEM:

$101.73B

EPS

TBLA:

$0.36

NEM:

$7.15

PE Ratio

TBLA:

15.26

NEM:

13.33

PEG Ratio

TBLA:

0.08

NEM:

0.35

PS Ratio

TBLA:

1.02

NEM:

4.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

TBLA:

$1.65B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TBLA:

$579.78M

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

TBLA:

$210.19M

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLA vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLA
TBLA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TBLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLA vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBLANEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.09

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.29

4.81

-1.53

TBLA vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLA Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLA and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBLA vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLA drawdown since its inception was -85.51%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLA and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLANEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.51%

-81.30%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-29.39%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.84%

-36.57%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.47%

-62.40%

-22.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.00%

-27.47%

-22.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.31%

-41.34%

-20.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.46%

12.73%

+2.73%

Volatility

TBLA vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) has a higher volatility of 16.69% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 14.14%. This indicates that TBLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLANEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.69%

14.14%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.00%

37.29%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.32%

47.74%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.32%

38.15%

+21.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.29%

35.73%

+23.56%

Dividends

TBLA vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

TBLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.07%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
TBLA
Taboola.com Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TBLA vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taboola.com Ltd. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
164.02M
0
(TBLA) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLA and NEM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLA has higher volatility (16.69%) compared to NEM (14.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLA dropped -85.51% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLA and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer