TBJL vs. JULB

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TBJL (Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. TBJL is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TBJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

TBJL vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBJL achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 5.70% return.

TBJL

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: -0.55%
• 6M: -1.07%
• 1Y: -0.32%
• 3Y*: -1.18%
• 5Y*: -3.21%
• 10Y*: —

JULB

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBJL vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TBJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July	-0.55%	-2.31%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	5.70%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between TBJL and JULB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.13

Return for Risk

TBJL vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBJL

TBJL Risk / Return Rank: 8
TBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBJL vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBJL	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.13	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBJL	JULB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.38	1.97	-2.35

Drawdowns

TBJL vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBJL drawdown since its inception was -29.36%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBJL and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBJL	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.36%	-5.24%	-24.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.02%	-0.77%	-20.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.63%	-0.87%	-14.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TBJL	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.93%	6.85%	-0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.89%	6.85%	+4.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.66%	6.85%	+3.81%

TBJL vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBJL vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

Neither TBJL nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBJL and JULB in my portfolio?

TBJL and JULB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TBJL or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBJL or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TBJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBJL or JULB?

TBJL and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TBJL and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TBJL and 0.25% for JULB.