PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBJL vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBJL vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBJL achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than HYG's 1.51% return.


TBJL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.15%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
-0.17%
3Y*
-1.02%
5Y*
-3.19%
10Y*

HYG

1D
0.19%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.84%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
4.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBJL vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TBJL
Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July
-0.48%1.74%-3.16%4.12%-20.82%-0.32%-1.92%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.51%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TBJL and HYG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2020

0.33

The correlation between TBJL and HYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.48 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBJL vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBJL
TBJL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBJL vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBJLHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.33

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

2.79

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

12.34

-12.41

TBJL vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBJL Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBJL and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBJLHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

1.72

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.51

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.46

-0.83

Drawdowns

TBJL vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBJL drawdown since its inception was -29.36%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBJL and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBJLHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.36%

-34.25%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.46%

-2.34%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-4.56%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.57%

-15.79%

-12.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.96%

-0.09%

-20.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.63%

-3.24%

-12.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

0.53%

+1.97%

Volatility

TBJL vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July (TBJL) is 0.70%, while iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that TBJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBJLHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

1.21%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

3.01%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.95%

3.81%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.89%

7.53%

+3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

8.29%

+2.37%

TBJL vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBJL vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

TBJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.91%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
TBJL
Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buffer ETF – July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBJL and HYG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYG has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to TBJL (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBJL dropped -29.36% vs HYG's -34.25%.

On 5-year performance, HYG leads with 3.81% vs -3.19% for TBJL. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, TBJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYG has performed better with a 3.81% return vs -3.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TBJL.

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.00% for TBJL.

TBJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. TBJL tracks iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TBJL and 0.49% for HYG.

HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBJL and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer