TBIL vs. XHLF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TBIL (US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF) and XHLF (BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBIL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill 3 Month Index, while XHLF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TBIL returned 4.64%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for XHLF. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for XHLF.

Performance

TBIL vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBIL achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than XHLF's 1.39% return.

TBIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XHLF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: 4.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBIL vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TBIL US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF	1.49%	4.19%	5.15%	5.12%	1.06%
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	1.39%	4.21%	5.04%	4.90%	0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between TBIL and XHLF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022	0.32

Return for Risk

TBIL vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBIL

TBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
TBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

XHLF

XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBIL vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBIL	XHLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	13.78	12.43	+1.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	58.40	45.85	+12.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	17.16	11.75	+5.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	196.84	98.81	+98.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	934.41	670.31	+264.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TBIL vs. XHLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBIL Sharpe Ratio is 13.78, which is comparable to the XHLF Sharpe Ratio of 12.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBIL and XHLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBIL	XHLF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.78	12.43	+1.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	14.07	10.75	+3.32

Drawdowns

TBIL vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum XHLF drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIL and XHLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBIL	XHLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-0.11%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.02%	-0.04%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.02%	-0.06%	+0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-0.00%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	0.01%	-0.01%

Volatility

TBIL vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison

US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) have volatilities of 0.08% and 0.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBIL	XHLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.08%	0.08%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.19%	0.22%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29%	0.32%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.32%	0.42%	-0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.32%	0.42%	-0.10%

TBIL vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TBIL vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison

TBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, which matches XHLF's 3.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TBIL US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF	3.82%	4.07%	5.02%	5.00%	1.10%
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	3.85%	3.98%	4.96%	4.50%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBIL and XHLF in my portfolio?

TBIL and XHLF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBIL or XHLF?

XHLF has higher volatility (0.08%) compared to TBIL (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBIL dropped -0.10% vs XHLF's -0.11%.

Which ETF is better, TBIL or XHLF?

On 3-year performance, TBIL leads with 4.64% vs 4.62% for XHLF. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBIL or XHLF?

Over the 3-year period, TBIL has performed better with a 4.64% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBIL or XHLF?

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TBIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBIL or XHLF?

XHLF has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.82% for TBIL.

What is the main difference between TBIL and XHLF?

TBIL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while XHLF is Government Bonds. TBIL tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill 3 Month Index, while XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TBIL and 0.03% for XHLF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.78 vs 12.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.