TBIL vs. CPAG
TBIL (F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF) and CPAG (F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBIL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3M Total Return USD Unhedged Index, while CPAG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for CPAG.
Performance
TBIL vs. CPAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBIL achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than CPAG's 0.18% return.
TBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPAG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBIL vs. CPAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TBIL F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF | 1.69% | 1.59% |
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 2.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBIL and CPAG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBIL vs. CPAG — Risk / Return Rank
TBIL
CPAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TBIL vs. CPAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBIL | CPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 17.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 195.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 929.44 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBIL vs. CPAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum CPAG drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIL and CPAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBIL | CPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -2.78% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.48% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.79% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
TBIL vs. CPAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBIL | CPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29% | 3.70% | -3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 3.70% | -3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 3.70% | -3.38% |
TBIL vs. CPAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CPAG's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBIL vs. CPAG - Dividend Comparison
TBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, while CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBIL F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.07% | 5.02% | 5.00% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBIL and CPAG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.
TBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for CPAG.
TBIL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CPAG is Total Bond Market. TBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3M Total Return USD Unhedged Index, while CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TBIL and 0.31% for CPAG.
Find the right allocation for TBIL and CPAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer