PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBIL vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBIL vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBIL achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 110.49% return.


TBIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
3.39%
1M
46.76%
YTD
110.49%
6M
111.80%
1Y
240.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBIL vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TBIL
US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
1.49%4.19%5.15%1.50%
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
110.49%53.93%-17.00%26.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TBIL and AMDY is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

-0.07

The correlation between TBIL and AMDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBIL vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBIL
TBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBIL vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBILAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+53.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

17.16

1.64

+15.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

196.84

8.77

+188.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

934.41

19.77

+914.64

TBIL vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBIL Sharpe Ratio is 13.78, which is higher than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 4.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBIL and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBILAMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.78

4.53

+9.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

14.07

1.25

+12.82

Drawdowns

TBIL vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIL and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBILAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-53.92%

+53.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-27.59%

+27.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-18.02%

+18.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

12.22%

-12.22%

Volatility

TBIL vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) is 0.08%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.81%. This indicates that TBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBILAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

20.81%

-20.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.19%

39.99%

-39.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29%

53.40%

-53.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.32%

46.01%

-45.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.32%

46.01%

-45.69%

TBIL vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBIL vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

TBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than AMDY's 54.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
54.91%80.68%109.98%6.68%0.00%
TBIL
US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
3.82%4.07%5.02%5.00%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBIL and AMDY have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to TBIL (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBIL dropped -0.10% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 240.44% vs 3.93% for TBIL. On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 240.44% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 3.82% for TBIL.

TBIL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while AMDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TBIL and 0.99% for AMDY.

TBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.78 vs 4.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBIL and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer