TBIIX vs. LSSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX).
TBIIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009. LSSAX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Mar 2, 2006.
Performance
TBIIX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TBIIX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBIIX TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund | -0.49% | 7.12% | 1.13% | 5.13% | -13.61% | -1.81% | 7.69% | 8.58% | -0.25% | 3.43% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 0.29% | 8.32% | 3.94% | 7.01% | -11.82% | 0.64% | 4.68% | 6.81% | 2.48% | 3.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBIIX achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, TBIIX has underperformed LSSAX with an annualized return of 1.42%, while LSSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.53% annualized return.
TBIIX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.42%
LSSAX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TBIIX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBIIX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TBIIX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank
TBIIX
LSSAX
TBIIX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBIIX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 1.61 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 2.49 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 3.41 | -1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 10.00 | -5.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBIIX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.61 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.25 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.59 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.95 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between TBIIX and LSSAX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TBIIX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison
TBIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than LSSAX's 4.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBIIX TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund | 3.52% | 3.73% | 3.14% | 2.44% | 2.11% | 2.07% | 3.17% | 2.82% | 2.46% | 2.44% | 2.31% | 2.61% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 4.28% | 4.23% | 4.54% | 5.65% | 6.47% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 5.48% | 5.62% | 5.42% | 5.12% | 5.20% |
Drawdowns
TBIIX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBIIX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIIX and LSSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBIIX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.33% | -16.40% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -2.45% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -16.40% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.33% | -16.40% | -2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.35% | -1.53% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -1.98% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.84% | +0.15% |
Volatility
TBIIX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) at 1.24%. This indicates that TBIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TBIIX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 1.24% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 2.68% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.55% | 4.69% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.05% | 5.73% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 4.39% | +0.61% |