TBIIX vs. NOBOX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX).
TBIIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009. NOBOX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2007.
Performance
TBIIX vs. NOBOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TBIIX vs. NOBOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBIIX TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund | -0.28% | 7.12% | 1.13% | 5.13% | -13.61% | -1.81% | 7.69% | 8.58% | -0.25% | 3.43% |
NOBOX Northern Bond Index Fund | -0.03% | 6.14% | 0.82% | 4.86% | -13.84% | -2.10% | 7.20% | 8.73% | -0.17% | 3.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBIIX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than NOBOX's -0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, TBIIX has outperformed NOBOX with an annualized return of 1.44%, while NOBOX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.23% annualized return.
TBIIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.12%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
NOBOX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.49%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TBIIX vs. NOBOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TBIIX and NOBOX have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TBIIX vs. NOBOX — Risk / Return Rank
TBIIX
NOBOX
TBIIX vs. NOBOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBIIX | NOBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.94 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.40 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 1.77 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 5.14 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBIIX | NOBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.94 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | -0.08 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.25 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between TBIIX and NOBOX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TBIIX vs. NOBOX - Dividend Comparison
TBIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than NOBOX's 3.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBIIX TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund | 3.51% | 3.73% | 3.14% | 2.44% | 2.11% | 2.07% | 3.17% | 2.82% | 2.46% | 2.44% | 2.31% | 2.61% |
NOBOX Northern Bond Index Fund | 3.97% | 2.88% | 3.46% | 2.63% | 1.53% | 2.10% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 2.80% | 2.77% | 2.45% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
TBIIX vs. NOBOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBIIX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, roughly equal to the maximum NOBOX drawdown of -20.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIIX and NOBOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBIIX | NOBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.33% | -20.03% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -2.80% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -19.15% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.33% | -20.03% | +0.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.15% | -5.99% | +1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -3.52% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.96% | +0.04% |
Volatility
TBIIX vs. NOBOX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) have volatilities of 1.61% and 1.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TBIIX | NOBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 1.61% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 2.87% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.55% | 4.59% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.05% | 6.07% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 5.01% | -0.01% |