PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBGVX vs. FCNSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBGVX vs. FCNSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) and Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBGVX achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly higher than FCNSX's 10.18% return.


TBGVX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.81%
6M
7.67%
YTD
12.03%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
8.01%

FCNSX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.08%
6M
8.31%
YTD
10.18%
1Y
19.47%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBGVX vs. FCNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
12.03%23.86%2.47%12.48%-7.52%15.62%-1.00%14.64%-6.72%3.76%
FCNSX
Fidelity Series Canada Fund
10.18%28.56%9.88%15.95%-6.88%28.62%4.47%27.78%-15.01%10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TBGVX and FCNSX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2017

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between TBGVX and FCNSX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBGVX vs. FCNSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBGVX
TBGVX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TBGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TBGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNSX
FCNSX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FCNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBGVX vs. FCNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) and Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBGVXFCNSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.72

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.28

9.21

-2.93

TBGVX vs. FCNSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the FCNSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBGVX and FCNSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBGVX vs. FCNSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBGVX drawdown since its inception was -50.97%, which is greater than FCNSX's maximum drawdown of -41.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBGVX and FCNSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBGVXFCNSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.97%

-41.47%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-7.48%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.45%

-12.13%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-21.35%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

0.00%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-5.12%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.20%

+0.79%

Volatility

TBGVX vs. FCNSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) is 2.49%, while Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that TBGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBGVXFCNSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.94%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

10.25%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

12.93%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

16.26%

-5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.54%

18.48%

-5.94%

TBGVX vs. FCNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBGVX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBGVX vs. FCNSX - Dividend Comparison

TBGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than FCNSX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNSX
Fidelity Series Canada Fund
1.87%2.06%3.05%3.42%3.12%2.20%2.14%2.24%2.51%1.07%0.00%0.00%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
10.81%12.11%9.95%4.55%5.68%8.89%0.94%1.88%6.74%1.10%3.16%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBGVX and FCNSX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNSX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to TBGVX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBGVX dropped -50.97% vs FCNSX's -41.47%.

TBGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBGVX and FCNSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer