PortfoliosLab logo
TBGVX vs. NSBRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TBGVX and NSBRX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

TBGVX vs. NSBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TBGVX:

0.64

NSBRX:

0.91

Sortino Ratio

TBGVX:

0.95

NSBRX:

1.21

Omega Ratio

TBGVX:

1.14

NSBRX:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

TBGVX:

0.72

NSBRX:

0.84

Martin Ratio

TBGVX:

2.22

NSBRX:

3.47

Ulcer Index

TBGVX:

3.70%

NSBRX:

3.60%

Daily Std Dev

TBGVX:

12.74%

NSBRX:

15.86%

Max Drawdown

TBGVX:

-50.97%

NSBRX:

-45.14%

Current Drawdown

TBGVX:

0.00%

NSBRX:

-2.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBGVX achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than NSBRX's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, TBGVX has underperformed NSBRX with an annualized return of 5.47%, while NSBRX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.


TBGVX

YTD

13.70%

1M

5.56%

6M

12.24%

1Y

9.21%

3Y*

8.57%

5Y*

10.29%

10Y*

5.47%

NSBRX

YTD

1.27%

1M

4.62%

6M

-1.73%

1Y

14.26%

3Y*

10.30%

5Y*

13.02%

10Y*

10.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund

TBGVX vs. NSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBGVX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than NSBRX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TBGVX vs. NSBRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBGVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TBGVX is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TBGVX is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TBGVX is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TBGVX is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TBGVX is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TBGVX is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NSBRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NSBRX is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NSBRX is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NSBRX is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NSBRX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NSBRX is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NSBRX is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TBGVX vs. NSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TBGVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the NSBRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBGVX and NSBRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TBGVX vs. NSBRX - Dividend Comparison

TBGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, more than NSBRX's 6.77% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
8.75%9.95%4.55%5.68%8.89%0.94%1.88%6.74%1.45%3.16%4.94%3.79%
NSBRX
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund
6.77%6.82%3.01%3.66%3.67%4.68%8.72%7.32%4.57%1.75%6.24%4.65%

Drawdowns

TBGVX vs. NSBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBGVX drawdown since its inception was -50.97%, which is greater than NSBRX's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBGVX and NSBRX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TBGVX vs. NSBRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) is 2.13%, while Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that TBGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...