PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBFG vs. SWAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TBFG vs. SWAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TBFG vs. SWAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
-0.04%14.56%10.48%
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF
-3.58%13.93%14.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBFG achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly higher than SWAN's -3.58% return.


TBFG

1D
2.25%
1M
-5.22%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
2.85%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SWAN

1D
1.86%
1M
-5.08%
YTD
-3.58%
6M
-2.03%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TBFG vs. SWAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than SWAN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TBFG vs. SWAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFG
TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SWAN
SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBFG vs. SWAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBFGSWANDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

1.18

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

1.70

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.68

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.97

6.45

+1.52

TBFG vs. SWAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the SWAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBFG and SWAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBFGSWANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.18

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.49

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between TBFG and SWAN is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TBFG vs. SWAN - Dividend Comparison

TBFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than SWAN's 3.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
2.59%2.65%2.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF
3.04%2.86%2.54%2.98%2.12%5.04%1.64%3.69%0.29%

Drawdowns

TBFG vs. SWAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFG drawdown since its inception was -13.43%, smaller than the maximum SWAN drawdown of -31.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFG and SWAN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TBFGSWANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-31.04%

+17.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-7.05%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-5.18%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-9.07%

+7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.83%

+0.24%

Volatility

TBFG vs. SWAN - Volatility Comparison

The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) at 4.11%. This indicates that TBFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TBFGSWANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

4.11%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

6.86%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

9.77%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.98%

11.27%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.98%

12.50%

-1.52%