TBFC vs. GDT
TBFC (The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TBFC charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
TBFC vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TBFC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 1Y
- 11.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.55%
GDT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- 6M
- -12.09%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $108.93K | $73.53K | $104.60K | |
| $27.22K | $40.53K | $62.22K |
TBFC vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF | 3.05% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -15.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBFC and GDT is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBFC vs. GDT — Risk / Return Rank
TBFC
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TBFC vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBFC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBFC vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBFC drawdown since its inception was -8.89%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFC and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBFC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -24.66% | +15.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -23.67% | +22.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -13.61% | +12.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | — | — |
Volatility
TBFC vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBFC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.07% | 30.68% | -23.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 30.68% | -23.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 30.68% | -23.42% |
TBFC vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBFC has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBFC vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
TBFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than GDT's 3.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 3.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF | 3.02% | 3.28% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBFC and GDT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TBFC.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 3.02% for TBFC.
They also come from different issuers: Brinsmere and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TBFC and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for TBFC and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer