TBFC vs. GDT
TBFC (The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TBFC charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
TBFC vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TBFC
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 13.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBFC vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF | 2.97% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBFC and GDT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBFC vs. GDT — Risk / Return Rank
TBFC
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TBFC vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBFC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.13 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBFC vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBFC drawdown since its inception was -8.89%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFC and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBFC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -22.61% | +13.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -22.49% | +21.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -11.03% | +9.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | — | — |
Volatility
TBFC vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBFC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.89% | 32.99% | -26.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 32.99% | -25.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 32.99% | -25.70% |
TBFC vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBFC has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBFC vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
TBFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than GDT's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF | 2.96% | 3.28% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBFC and GDT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TBFC.
TBFC has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.91% for GDT.
They also come from different issuers: Brinsmere and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TBFC and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for TBFC and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer