PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBF vs. SJB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBF vs. SJB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) and ProShares Short High Yield (SJB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBF achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than SJB's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, TBF has outperformed SJB with an annualized return of 3.37%, while SJB has yielded a comparatively lower -3.55% annualized return.


TBF

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.84%
6M
5.10%
YTD
3.84%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
3.37%

SJB

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.22%
6M
0.77%
YTD
0.57%
1Y
-0.21%
3Y*
-1.73%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
-3.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBF vs. SJB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBF
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
3.84%1.27%16.33%2.43%42.37%1.33%-19.35%-10.96%3.26%-8.46%
SJB
ProShares Short High Yield
0.57%-1.87%-0.84%-5.63%9.57%-6.69%-9.23%-11.42%2.47%-6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TBF and SJB is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2011

-0.02

The correlation between TBF and SJB shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBF vs. SJB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBF
TBF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBF Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SJB
SJB Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJB Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBF vs. SJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) and ProShares Short High Yield (SJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBFSJBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.99

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

-0.08

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.53

-0.15

+0.68

TBF vs. SJB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the SJB Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBF and SJB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBF vs. SJB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBF drawdown since its inception was -70.40%, which is greater than SJB's maximum drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBF and SJB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBFSJBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.40%

-58.06%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-2.74%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.79%

-10.54%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-13.30%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.39%

-32.86%

-5.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.59%

-57.47%

+14.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.39%

-42.58%

-4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

1.41%

+1.99%

Volatility

TBF vs. SJB - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to ProShares Short High Yield (SJB) at 0.83%. This indicates that TBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBFSJBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

0.83%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.69%

3.08%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

3.85%

+5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.65%

7.52%

+8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

8.45%

+6.00%

TBF vs. SJB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBF has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than SJB's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBF vs. SJB - Dividend Comparison

TBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than SJB's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SJB
ProShares Short High Yield
3.61%3.86%5.86%4.10%0.46%0.00%0.07%1.27%0.71%
TBF
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
2.73%3.39%4.06%4.99%0.36%0.00%0.22%1.68%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBF and SJB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBF has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to SJB (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBF dropped -70.40% vs SJB's -58.06%.

On 10-year performance, TBF leads with 3.37% vs -3.55% for SJB. On fees, TBF is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, SJB has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TBF has performed better with a 3.37% return vs -3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBF is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SJB.

SJB has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.73% for TBF.

TBF tracks U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index (-100%), while SJB tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index (-100%). Their fees differ too: 0.94% for TBF and 0.95% for SJB.

TBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBF and SJB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer