TBF vs. TTT
TBF (ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury) and TTT (UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury) are both exchange-traded funds - TBF is a Inverse Bonds fund tracking the U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index (-100%), while TTT is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TBF returned 2.89%/yr vs -0.85%/yr for TTT. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TBF charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TTT.
Performance
TBF vs. TTT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBF achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than TTT's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, TBF has outperformed TTT with an annualized return of 2.89%, while TTT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.85% annualized return.
TBF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 1.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
TTT
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- -4.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 18.57%
- 10Y*
- -0.85%
TBF vs. TTT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBF ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury | 1.51% | 1.27% | 16.33% | 2.43% | 42.37% | 1.33% | -19.35% | -10.96% | 3.26% | -8.46% |
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 0.59% | -7.89% | 38.07% | -11.25% | 150.17% | 2.55% | -54.12% | -34.88% | 6.34% | -25.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBF and TTT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2012 | 0.99 |
The correlation between TBF and TTT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBF vs. TTT — Risk / Return Rank
TBF
TTT
TBF vs. TTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) and UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBF | TTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.00 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | -0.18 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | -0.34 | +0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBF vs. TTT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBF drawdown since its inception was -70.40%, smaller than the maximum TTT drawdown of -94.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBF and TTT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBF | TTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.40% | -94.00% | +23.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -22.18% | +14.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.79% | -49.69% | +31.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.79% | -49.69% | +31.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.39% | -81.76% | +43.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.88% | -78.91% | +35.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.41% | -70.37% | +22.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 11.89% | -8.58% |
Volatility
TBF vs. TTT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) is 2.20%, while UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that TBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBF | TTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 6.36% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.52% | 19.77% | -13.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.29% | 28.33% | -19.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 47.02% | -31.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 43.32% | -28.82% |
TBF vs. TTT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBF has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than TTT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBF vs. TTT - Dividend Comparison
TBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than TTT's 9.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBF ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury | 2.86% | 3.39% | 4.06% | 4.99% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 1.68% | 0.88% |
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 9.61% | 9.87% | 4.86% | 12.15% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 1.88% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, TBF and TTT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TTT has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to TBF (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBF dropped -70.40% vs TTT's -94.00%.
On 10-year performance, TBF leads with 2.89% vs -0.85% for TTT. On fees, TBF is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, TBF has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TBF has performed better with a 2.89% return vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBF is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TTT.
TTT has the higher dividend yield at 9.61%, compared with 2.86% for TBF.
TBF is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while TTT is Leveraged Bonds. TBF tracks U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index (-100%), while TTT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.94% for TBF and 0.95% for TTT.
TBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBF and TTT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer