SJB vs. EEM
SJB (ProShares Short High Yield) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SJB is a Inverse Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index (-100%), while EEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SJB returned -3.58%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for EEM. Their -0.59 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SJB charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
SJB vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJB achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 17.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SJB has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of -3.58%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.32% annualized return.
SJB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 0.70%
- 3Y*
- -1.64%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- -3.58%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.06%
EEM
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 35.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.56B | $1.60B | $1.90B | |
| $1.85M | $1.63M | $3.02M |
SJB vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJB ProShares Short High Yield | 1.17% | -1.87% | -0.84% | -5.63% | 9.57% | -6.69% | -9.23% | -11.42% | 2.47% | -6.17% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 17.75% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJB and EEM is -0.58, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2011 | -0.59 |
The correlation between SJB and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJB vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
SJB
EEM
SJB vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short High Yield (SJB) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SJB | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.27 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 2.44 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.54 | 7.49 | -6.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SJB vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJB drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJB and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJB | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -66.43% | +8.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.74% | -14.24% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.54% | -17.29% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.30% | -35.01% | +21.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.86% | -39.82% | +6.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.22% | -10.00% | -47.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.62% | -15.95% | -26.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 4.63% | -3.20% |
Volatility
SJB vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short High Yield (SJB) is 1.15%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that SJB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJB | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 9.09% | -7.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.20% | 22.40% | -19.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 24.46% | -20.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.51% | 19.83% | -12.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.44% | 20.80% | -12.36% |
SJB vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SJB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
SJB vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
SJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than EEM's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.74% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
SJB ProShares Short High Yield | 3.59% | 3.86% | 5.86% | 4.10% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 1.27% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SJB and EEM have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEM has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to SJB (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJB dropped -58.06% vs EEM's -66.43%.
On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 8.32% vs -3.58% for SJB. On fees, EEM is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, SJB has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 8.32% return vs -3.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEM is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SJB.
SJB has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.74% for EEM.
SJB is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while EEM is Emerging Markets Equities. SJB tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index (-100%), while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SJB and 0.72% for EEM.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SJB and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer