PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBC vs. BWMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TBC vs. BWMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (TBC) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TBC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BWMN

1D
-2.40%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
-9.70%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
18.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBC vs. BWMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBC
AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d
0.00%0.00%6.59%15.83%-11.61%2.88%
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
-3.88%32.34%-29.76%62.56%2.85%51.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TBC and BWMN is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.10

Fundamentals

EPS

TBC:

$3.05

BWMN:

$0.64

PE Ratio

TBC:

8.20

BWMN:

49.97

PEG Ratio

TBC:

0.33

BWMN:

0.10

PS Ratio

TBC:

1.43

BWMN:

1.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

TBC:

$125.65B

BWMN:

$377.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TBC:

$100.22B

BWMN:

$175.89M

EBITDA (TTM)

TBC:

$36.14B

BWMN:

$42.71M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBC vs. BWMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBC

BWMN
BWMN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BWMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWMN Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BWMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWMN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBC vs. BWMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (TBC) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TBC vs. BWMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBCBWMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

Drawdowns

TBC vs. BWMN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBCBWMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.11%

Volatility

TBC vs. BWMN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBCBWMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.03%

Dividends

TBC vs. BWMN - Dividend Comparison

Neither TBC nor BWMN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TBC
AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d
0.00%0.00%5.63%5.68%6.20%5.18%5.00%5.11%1.52%

Financials

TBC vs. BWMN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
33.47B
0
(TBC) Total Revenue
(BWMN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TBC and BWMN have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBC and BWMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer