TBC vs. BWMN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (TBC) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN).

Performance

TBC vs. BWMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (TBC) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TBC vs. BWMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TBC AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d	0.00%	0.00%	6.59%	15.83%	-11.61%	2.88%
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.	-13.87%	32.34%	-29.76%	62.56%	2.85%	51.75%

Fundamentals

EPS TBC : $4.56 BWMN : $0.75
PE Ratio TBC : 5.47 BWMN : 37.95
PEG Ratio TBC : 0.23 BWMN : 0.08
PS Ratio TBC : 0.95 BWMN : 1.32
Total Revenue (TTM) TBC : $125.65B BWMN : $361.05M
Gross Profit (TTM) TBC : $100.22B BWMN : $183.71M
EBITDA (TTM) TBC : $36.14B BWMN : $42.64M

Returns By Period

TBC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWMN

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -15.21%
• YTD: -13.87%
• 6M: -32.86%
• 1Y: 30.28%
• 3Y*: -0.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TBC vs. BWMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWMN

BWMN Risk / Return Rank: 60
BWMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BWMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BWMN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BWMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
BWMN Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBC vs. BWMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (TBC) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBC	BWMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.33	—

Correlation

The correlation between TBC and BWMN is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TBC vs. BWMN - Dividend Comparison

Neither TBC nor BWMN has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TBC AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d	0.00%	0.00%	5.63%	5.68%	6.20%	5.18%	5.00%	5.11%	1.52%
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TBC	BWMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-56.21%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-39.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-35.99%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.37%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TBC	BWMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.23%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	45.79%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	47.34%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	47.34%	—

Financials