BWMN vs. BAH
Compare and contrast key facts about Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH).
Performance
BWMN vs. BAH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BWMN vs. BAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. | -13.87% | 32.34% | -29.76% | 62.56% | 2.85% | 51.75% |
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | -6.80% | -33.02% | 2.00% | 24.47% | 25.71% | 2.12% |
Fundamentals
BWMN:
$479.95M
BAH:
$9.62B
BWMN:
$0.75
BAH:
$6.77
BWMN:
37.95
BAH:
11.53
BWMN:
0.08
BAH:
0.38
BWMN:
1.32
BAH:
0.85
BWMN:
1.84
BAH:
9.38
BWMN:
$361.05M
BAH:
$11.41B
BWMN:
$183.71M
BAH:
$6.01B
BWMN:
$42.64M
BAH:
$1.13B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWMN achieves a -13.87% return, which is significantly lower than BAH's -6.80% return.
BWMN
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -13.87%
- 6M
- -32.86%
- 1Y
- 30.28%
- 3Y*
- -0.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAH
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- -6.80%
- 6M
- -20.82%
- 1Y
- -23.53%
- 3Y*
- -3.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWMN vs. BAH — Risk / Return Rank
BWMN
BAH
BWMN vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BWMN | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | -0.59 | +1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | -0.58 | +1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.92 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | -0.58 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.56 | -0.95 | +2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BWMN | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | -0.59 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.58 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between BWMN and BAH is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BWMN vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison
BWMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 2.87% | 2.61% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 1.75% | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.69% |
Drawdowns
BWMN vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWMN drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, roughly equal to the maximum BAH drawdown of -58.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWMN and BAH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWMN | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.21% | -58.75% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.93% | -41.32% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -58.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.99% | -56.66% | +20.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.37% | -10.16% | -10.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.24% | 25.21% | -8.97% |
Volatility
BWMN vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) has a higher volatility of 18.87% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) at 9.46%. This indicates that BWMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BWMN | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.87% | 9.46% | +9.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.23% | 31.63% | +8.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.79% | 39.94% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.34% | 30.40% | +16.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.34% | 28.38% | +18.96% |
Financials
BWMN vs. BAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities