PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BWMN vs. BAH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BWMN and BAH is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

BWMN vs. BAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
54.50%
38.90%
BWMN
BAH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BWMN:

-0.67

BAH:

-0.74

Sortino Ratio

BWMN:

-0.76

BAH:

-0.89

Omega Ratio

BWMN:

0.90

BAH:

0.88

Calmar Ratio

BWMN:

-0.62

BAH:

-0.56

Martin Ratio

BWMN:

-1.24

BAH:

-1.23

Ulcer Index

BWMN:

28.19%

BAH:

20.30%

Daily Std Dev

BWMN:

51.78%

BAH:

33.80%

Max Drawdown

BWMN:

-56.21%

BAH:

-44.33%

Current Drawdown

BWMN:

-48.50%

BAH:

-40.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWMN:

$373.41M

BAH:

$13.55B

EPS

BWMN:

$0.17

BAH:

$6.70

PE Ratio

BWMN:

127.24

BAH:

16.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWMN:

$331.66M

BAH:

$9.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWMN:

$167.60M

BAH:

$3.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

BWMN:

$22.68M

BAH:

$1.23B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWMN achieves a -13.31% return, which is significantly higher than BAH's -14.75% return.


BWMN

YTD

-13.31%

1M

14.14%

6M

-8.11%

1Y

-33.28%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BAH

YTD

-14.75%

1M

-6.24%

6M

-31.55%

1Y

-24.52%

5Y*

10.75%

10Y*

16.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BWMN vs. BAH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BWMN is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BWMN is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BWMN is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BWMN is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BWMN is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BWMN is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BAH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAH is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAH is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAH is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAH is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAH is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAH is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BWMN vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BWMN, currently valued at -0.67, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
BWMN: -0.67
BAH: -0.74
The chart of Sortino ratio for BWMN, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
BWMN: -0.76
BAH: -0.89
The chart of Omega ratio for BWMN, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
BWMN: 0.90
BAH: 0.88
The chart of Calmar ratio for BWMN, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
BWMN: -0.62
BAH: -0.56
The chart of Martin ratio for BWMN, currently valued at -1.24, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
BWMN: -1.24
BAH: -1.23

The current BWMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is comparable to the BAH Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWMN and BAH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.67
-0.74
BWMN
BAH

Dividends

BWMN vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison

BWMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
1.90%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%9.16%

Drawdowns

BWMN vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWMN drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, which is greater than BAH's maximum drawdown of -44.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWMN and BAH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-48.50%
-40.82%
BWMN
BAH

Volatility

BWMN vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) has a higher volatility of 20.63% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) at 14.62%. This indicates that BWMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
20.63%
14.62%
BWMN
BAH

Financials

BWMN vs. BAH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab