PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TBC vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

TBC vs. T

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (TBC) and AT&T Inc. (T).

Performance

TBC vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (TBC) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TBC vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TBC
AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d		0.00%0.00%6.59%15.83%-11.61%1.65%7.53%25.45%-5.41%
T
AT&T Inc.		18.07%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-10.49%

Fundamentals

EPS

TBC:

$4.56

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

TBC:

5.47

T:

9.52

PEG Ratio

TBC:

0.23

T:

0.39

PS Ratio

TBC:

0.95

T:

1.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

TBC:

$125.65B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TBC:

$100.22B

T:

$100.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

TBC:

$36.14B

T:

$53.20B

Returns By Period

TBC

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

T

1D
0.73%
1M
3.50%
YTD
18.07%
6M
4.97%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
5.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d

AT&T Inc.

Often compared with TBC:
TBC vs. TBBTBC vs. GOOGTBC vs. BWMN
Often compared with T:
T vs. VZT vs. JEPIT vs. SPYT vs. TMUST vs. SCHDT vs. NFLXT vs. F

Return for Risk

TBC vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TBC
T
T Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBC vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (TBC) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TBC vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TBCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.31

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.47

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.25

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

—

0.40

—

Correlation

The correlation between TBC and T is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TBC vs. T - Dividend Comparison

TBC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBC
AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d		0.00%0.00%5.63%5.68%6.20%5.18%5.00%5.11%1.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%
T
AT&T Inc.		3.83%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Drawdowns

TBC vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

TBCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

—

-64.15%

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-20.60%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-36.68%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-42.35%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

—

-0.38%

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

—

-15.74%

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

9.06%

—

Volatility

TBC vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

TBCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

6.70%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

16.42%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

22.39%

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

—

23.82%

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

—

23.49%

—

Financials

TBC vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
33.47B
33.47B
(TBC) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items