PortfoliosLab logo
BWMN vs. LMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BWMN and LMB is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BWMN vs. LMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BWMN:

-0.40

LMB:

2.31

Sortino Ratio

BWMN:

-0.12

LMB:

2.86

Omega Ratio

BWMN:

0.98

LMB:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

BWMN:

-0.29

LMB:

4.13

Martin Ratio

BWMN:

-0.53

LMB:

11.25

Ulcer Index

BWMN:

30.64%

LMB:

12.69%

Daily Std Dev

BWMN:

51.18%

LMB:

62.17%

Max Drawdown

BWMN:

-56.21%

LMB:

-84.10%

Current Drawdown

BWMN:

-39.48%

LMB:

-0.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWMN:

$436.00M

LMB:

$1.43B

EPS

BWMN:

$0.17

LMB:

$2.78

PE Ratio

BWMN:

148.82

LMB:

44.18

PS Ratio

BWMN:

0.98

LMB:

2.68

PB Ratio

BWMN:

1.79

LMB:

8.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWMN:

$444.59M

LMB:

$532.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWMN:

$218.44M

LMB:

$148.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

BWMN:

$28.23M

LMB:

$52.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWMN achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than LMB's 43.25% return.


BWMN

YTD

1.88%

1M

15.39%

6M

0.95%

1Y

-20.16%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LMB

YTD

43.25%

1M

53.41%

6M

37.98%

1Y

141.89%

5Y*

115.81%

10Y*

31.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BWMN vs. LMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BWMN is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BWMN is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BWMN is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BWMN is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BWMN is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BWMN is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMB is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMB is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMB is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMB is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMB is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMB is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BWMN vs. LMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BWMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the LMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWMN and LMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BWMN vs. LMB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BWMN nor LMB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BWMN vs. LMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWMN drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, smaller than the maximum LMB drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWMN and LMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BWMN vs. LMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) is 10.20%, while Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a volatility of 15.41%. This indicates that BWMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BWMN vs. LMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. and Limbach Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
112.93M
133.11M
(BWMN) Total Revenue
(LMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BWMN vs. LMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. and Limbach Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
51.4%
27.6%
(BWMN) Gross Margin
(LMB) Gross Margin
BWMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 58.10M and revenue of 112.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

LMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 36.72M and revenue of 133.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

BWMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.14M and revenue of 112.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

LMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.91M and revenue of 133.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

BWMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. reported a net income of -1.74M and revenue of 112.93M, resulting in a net margin of -1.5%.

LMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 10.21M and revenue of 133.11M, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.