BWMN vs. LMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BWMN or LMB.
Performance
BWMN vs. LMB - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWMN achieves a -28.72% return, which is significantly lower than LMB's 106.91% return.
BWMN
-28.72%
17.28%
-22.47%
-9.54%
N/A
N/A
LMB
106.91%
15.14%
97.07%
135.97%
100.88%
29.47%
Fundamentals
BWMN | LMB | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $457.26M | $1.05B |
EPS | -$0.79 | $2.18 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $292.38M | $517.82M |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $130.61M | $131.10M |
EBITDA (TTM) | $15.58M | $42.47M |
Key characteristics
BWMN | LMB | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | -0.17 | 2.50 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.13 | 2.94 |
Omega Ratio | 1.02 | 1.38 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.17 | 5.62 |
Martin Ratio | -0.32 | 14.50 |
Ulcer Index | 28.38% | 9.59% |
Daily Std Dev | 53.11% | 55.62% |
Max Drawdown | -52.38% | -84.10% |
Current Drawdown | -39.71% | -2.95% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between BWMN and LMB is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BWMN vs. LMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BWMN vs. LMB - Dividend Comparison
Neither BWMN nor LMB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BWMN vs. LMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWMN drawdown since its inception was -52.38%, smaller than the maximum LMB drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWMN and LMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BWMN vs. LMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) is 13.13%, while Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a volatility of 22.37%. This indicates that BWMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BWMN vs. LMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. and Limbach Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities