PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BWMN vs. LMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BWMN and LMB is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

BWMN vs. LMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
74.21%
741.24%
BWMN
LMB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BWMN:

-0.47

LMB:

1.88

Sortino Ratio

BWMN:

-0.37

LMB:

2.46

Omega Ratio

BWMN:

0.95

LMB:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

BWMN:

-0.48

LMB:

4.26

Martin Ratio

BWMN:

-0.82

LMB:

10.75

Ulcer Index

BWMN:

30.49%

LMB:

9.81%

Daily Std Dev

BWMN:

53.41%

LMB:

56.25%

Max Drawdown

BWMN:

-52.38%

LMB:

-84.10%

Current Drawdown

BWMN:

-41.93%

LMB:

-12.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWMN:

$474.53M

LMB:

$1.05B

EPS

BWMN:

-$0.79

LMB:

$2.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWMN:

$406.31M

LMB:

$517.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWMN:

$190.26M

LMB:

$131.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

BWMN:

$18.95M

LMB:

$47.77M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWMN achieves a -31.33% return, which is significantly lower than LMB's 97.40% return.


BWMN

YTD

-31.33%

1M

-7.93%

6M

-22.15%

1Y

-26.54%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LMB

YTD

97.40%

1M

-7.35%

6M

66.04%

1Y

101.84%

5Y*

96.76%

10Y*

28.48%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BWMN vs. LMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BWMN, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.471.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for BWMN, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.372.46
The chart of Omega ratio for BWMN, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.951.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for BWMN, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.484.26
The chart of Martin ratio for BWMN, currently valued at -0.82, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-0.8210.75
BWMN
LMB

The current BWMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the LMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWMN and LMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.47
1.88
BWMN
LMB

Dividends

BWMN vs. LMB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BWMN nor LMB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BWMN vs. LMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWMN drawdown since its inception was -52.38%, smaller than the maximum LMB drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWMN and LMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-41.93%
-12.66%
BWMN
LMB

Volatility

BWMN vs. LMB - Volatility Comparison

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) has a higher volatility of 12.93% compared to Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) at 12.25%. This indicates that BWMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
12.93%
12.25%
BWMN
LMB

Financials

BWMN vs. LMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. and Limbach Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab