PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXM vs. XEMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXM vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXM achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD's 2.75% return.


TAXM

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.54%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XEMD

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.21%
YTD
2.75%
6M
3.27%
1Y
11.88%
3Y*
11.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXM vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAXM and XEMD is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXM vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAXM
TAXM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TAXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

XEMD
XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAXM vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAXMXEMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.51

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.39

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

15.27

-6.65

TAXM vs. XEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAXM Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the XEMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAXM and XEMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAXMXEMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

1.39

-0.26

Drawdowns

TAXM vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXM drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum XEMD drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXM and XEMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXMXEMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-10.01%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-3.52%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.37%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-1.26%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.78%

-0.01%

Volatility

TAXM vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) is 0.94%, while BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that TAXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXMXEMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

1.43%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

3.70%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67%

4.66%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.56%

6.88%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.56%

6.88%

-3.32%

TAXM vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAXM vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison

TAXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than XEMD's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TAXM
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents
3.29%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
5.82%6.15%6.30%6.19%3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAXM and XEMD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XEMD has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to TAXM (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAXM dropped -3.10% vs XEMD's -10.01%.

On 1-year performance, XEMD leads with 11.88% vs 6.62% for TAXM. On fees, XEMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TAXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XEMD has performed better with a 11.88% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XEMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TAXM.

XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 3.29% for TAXM.

TAXM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XEMD is Emerging Markets Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TAXM and 0.29% for XEMD.

XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXM and XEMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer