PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAUSX vs. JIPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAUSX vs. JIPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and John Hancock Funds Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (JIPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAUSX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than JIPIX's 1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, TAUSX has underperformed JIPIX with an annualized return of 1.56%, while JIPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.79% annualized return.


TAUSX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.12%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-0.45%
10Y*
1.56%

JIPIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.95%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAUSX vs. JIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAUSX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.20%7.38%0.94%4.76%-14.69%-1.49%9.52%8.71%-0.38%3.88%
JIPIX
John Hancock Funds Strategic Income Opportunities Fund
1.63%7.50%2.23%6.45%-10.43%0.80%8.46%11.01%-5.09%5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TAUSX and JIPIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.37

Over the past year, TAUSX and JIPIX have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAUSX vs. JIPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAUSX
TAUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TAUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TAUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

JIPIX
JIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
JIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAUSX vs. JIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and John Hancock Funds Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (JIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAUSXJIPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.50

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.39

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.10

9.04

-3.94

TAUSX vs. JIPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the JIPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAUSX and JIPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAUSXJIPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.32

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.27

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.68

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

1.06

-0.04

Drawdowns

TAUSX vs. JIPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAUSX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, which is greater than JIPIX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAUSX and JIPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAUSXJIPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-15.43%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.23%

-2.87%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.29%

-5.40%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

-15.43%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.90%

-15.43%

-4.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-0.26%

-4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-2.43%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.76%

+0.32%

Volatility

TAUSX vs. JIPIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to John Hancock Funds Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (JIPIX) at 1.13%. This indicates that TAUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAUSXJIPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.13%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

2.34%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.09%

2.96%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

4.13%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

4.14%

+0.86%

TAUSX vs. JIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAUSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than JIPIX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAUSX vs. JIPIX - Dividend Comparison

TAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than JIPIX's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIPIX
John Hancock Funds Strategic Income Opportunities Fund
3.84%3.73%2.59%2.23%3.77%2.87%2.03%2.72%3.71%3.14%2.54%6.91%
TAUSX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund
4.05%3.99%3.40%2.64%2.50%2.25%4.49%2.83%2.83%2.65%2.66%2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAUSX and JIPIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAUSX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to JIPIX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAUSX dropped -19.90% vs JIPIX's -15.43%.

JIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAUSX and JIPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer