PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAUSX vs. HTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAUSX vs. HTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAUSX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than HTD's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TAUSX has underperformed HTD with an annualized return of 1.56%, while HTD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.


TAUSX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.12%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-0.45%
10Y*
1.56%

HTD

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
10.11%
6M
8.09%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
8.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAUSX vs. HTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAUSX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.20%7.38%0.94%4.76%-14.69%-1.49%9.52%8.71%-0.38%3.88%
HTD
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund
10.11%15.87%25.68%-9.92%-6.24%32.36%-16.54%42.77%-9.13%16.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TAUSX and HTD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2004

0.07

The correlation between TAUSX and HTD shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAUSX vs. HTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAUSX
TAUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TAUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TAUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

HTD
HTD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
HTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAUSX vs. HTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAUSXHTDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.08

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.10

8.61

-3.51

TAUSX vs. HTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the HTD Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAUSX and HTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAUSXHTDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.57

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.46

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.37

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.43

+0.60

Drawdowns

TAUSX vs. HTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAUSX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum HTD drawdown of -69.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAUSX and HTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAUSXHTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-69.79%

+49.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.23%

-6.18%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.29%

-20.94%

+13.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

-31.58%

+11.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.90%

-56.57%

+36.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-2.09%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-8.80%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

2.21%

-1.13%

Volatility

TAUSX vs. HTD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) is 1.50%, while John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that TAUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAUSXHTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

2.66%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

8.94%

-5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.09%

12.11%

-8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

17.76%

-11.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

22.62%

-17.62%

TAUSX vs. HTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAUSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than HTD's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAUSX vs. HTD - Dividend Comparison

TAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than HTD's 7.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTD
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund
7.43%7.51%7.52%8.73%7.36%5.80%7.97%6.06%10.09%8.85%7.30%7.06%
TAUSX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund
4.05%3.99%3.40%2.64%2.50%2.25%4.49%2.83%2.83%2.65%2.66%2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAUSX and HTD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTD has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to TAUSX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAUSX dropped -19.90% vs HTD's -69.79%.

HTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAUSX and HTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer