TATYY vs. SHEL
TATYY (Tate & Lyle PLC ADR) and SHEL (Shell plc) are both stocks. TATYY operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while SHEL operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, TATYY returned 2.55%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for SHEL. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TATYY vs. SHEL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TATYY achieves a 50.19% return, which is significantly higher than SHEL's 27.49% return. Over the past 10 years, TATYY has underperformed SHEL with an annualized return of 2.55%, while SHEL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.
TATYY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 44.68%
- YTD
- 50.19%
- 1Y
- 7.76%
- 3Y*
- -4.75%
- 5Y*
- -0.40%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.83%
SHEL
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 17.89%
- 6M
- 21.62%
- YTD
- 27.49%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 23.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
SHEL Shell plc | $678.43M | $587.70M | $593.39M |
TATYY Tate & Lyle PLC ADR | $6.37K | $16.58K | $46.42K |
TATYY vs. SHEL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TATYY Tate & Lyle PLC ADR | 50.19% | -35.21% | -0.61% | -0.36% | 18.05% | -0.65% | -1.93% | 19.27% | -4.33% | 9.74% |
SHEL Shell plc | 27.49% | 22.16% | -0.87% | 20.19% | 36.18% | 34.27% | -41.08% | 6.38% | -7.23% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between TATYY and SHEL is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.11 |
The correlation between TATYY and SHEL shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TATYY:
$7.03B
SHEL:
$256.45B
TATYY:
£2.15
SHEL:
$9.02
TATYY:
10.23
SHEL:
10.20
TATYY:
0.70
SHEL:
0.89
TATYY:
1.54
SHEL:
1.43
TATYY:
£3.54B
SHEL:
$296.60B
TATYY:
£722.00M
SHEL:
$50.77B
TATYY:
£597.20M
SHEL:
$67.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TATYY vs. SHEL — Risk / Return Rank
TATYY
SHEL
TATYY vs. SHEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) and Shell plc (SHEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TATYY | SHEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.26 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 1.80 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 5.52 | -5.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TATYY vs. SHEL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TATYY drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, smaller than the maximum SHEL drawdown of -71.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATYY and SHEL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TATYY | SHEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.06% | -71.57% | +14.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.33% | -17.98% | -22.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.06% | -18.47% | -38.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.06% | -25.04% | -32.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.06% | -71.57% | +14.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.03% | -1.42% | -24.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -16.69% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.03% | 5.86% | +20.17% |
Volatility
TATYY vs. SHEL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) is 1.97%, while Shell plc (SHEL) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that TATYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TATYY | SHEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 7.11% | -5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.15% | 18.17% | +25.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.28% | 21.99% | +34.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.87% | 25.01% | +12.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 30.67% | +3.21% |
Dividends
TATYY vs. SHEL - Dividend Comparison
TATYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than SHEL's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHEL Shell plc | 3.22% | 3.90% | 4.39% | 3.76% | 3.48% | 3.78% | 5.69% | 6.27% | 6.27% | 2.75% | 6.49% | 8.17% |
TATYY Tate & Lyle PLC ADR | 3.56% | 5.27% | 3.03% | 2.90% | 19.44% | 4.72% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 4.18% | 3.64% | 3.81% | 0.00% |
Financials
TATYY vs. SHEL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tate & Lyle PLC ADR and Shell plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TATYY vs. SHEL - Profitability Comparison
TATYY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 996.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SHEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Shell plc reported a gross profit of 18.48B and revenue of 94.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
TATYY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported an operating income of 83.23M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.
SHEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Shell plc reported an operating income of 15.18B and revenue of 94.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.
TATYY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a net income of 41.62M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
SHEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Shell plc reported a net income of 10.82B and revenue of 94.66B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TATYY and SHEL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHEL has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to TATYY (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TATYY dropped -57.06% vs SHEL's -71.57%.
SHEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TATYY and SHEL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer