TASK vs. EZPW
TASK (TaskUs, Inc.) and EZPW (EZCORP, Inc.) are both stocks. TASK operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while EZPW operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, TASK returned 6.63%/yr vs 55.55%/yr for EZPW. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TASK vs. EZPW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TASK achieves a 18.57% return, which is significantly lower than EZPW's 63.95% return.
TASK
- 1D
- -9.43%
- 1M
- -8.58%
- YTD
- 18.57%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- -16.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPW
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 63.95%
- 6M
- 58.64%
- 1Y
- 139.22%
- 3Y*
- 55.55%
- 5Y*
- 33.75%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
TASK vs. EZPW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TASK TaskUs, Inc. | 18.57% | -30.40% | 29.61% | -22.66% | -68.68% | 73.56% |
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 63.95% | 58.92% | 39.82% | 7.24% | 10.58% | 3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TASK and EZPW is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
TASK:
$545.53M
EZPW:
$2.66B
TASK:
$1.14
EZPW:
$1.76
TASK:
5.16
EZPW:
18.07
TASK:
0.13
EZPW:
0.12
TASK:
0.60
EZPW:
1.79
TASK:
1.98
EZPW:
2.37
TASK:
$905.76M
EZPW:
$1.48B
TASK:
$139.75M
EZPW:
$865.21M
TASK:
$214.94M
EZPW:
$256.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TASK vs. EZPW — Risk / Return Rank
TASK
EZPW
TASK vs. EZPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TASK | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | 4.21 | -4.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.11 | 4.89 | -4.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.62 | -0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 13.15 | -13.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 35.47 | -36.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TASK | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 4.21 | -4.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | 0.11 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
TASK vs. EZPW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TASK drawdown since its inception was -90.21%, smaller than the maximum EZPW drawdown of -97.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TASK and EZPW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TASK | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.21% | -97.28% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.46% | -10.65% | -35.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.52% | -20.51% | -28.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.26% | -16.36% | -66.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.79% | -59.12% | -14.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.47% | 3.94% | +20.53% |
Volatility
TASK vs. EZPW - Volatility Comparison
TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) has a higher volatility of 18.50% compared to EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) at 11.44%. This indicates that TASK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TASK | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.50% | 11.44% | +7.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.25% | 24.93% | +33.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.41% | 33.27% | +40.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.60% | 33.95% | +38.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.60% | 39.25% | +33.35% |
Dividends
TASK vs. EZPW - Dividend Comparison
TASK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 124.57%, while EZPW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 0.00% |
TASK TaskUs, Inc. | 124.57% |
Financials
TASK vs. EZPW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TaskUs, Inc. and EZCORP, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TASK and EZPW have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TASK has higher volatility (18.50%) compared to EZPW (11.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TASK dropped -90.21% vs EZPW's -97.28%.
EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.21 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TASK and EZPW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer