PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TARK vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TARK vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 94.33% return.


TARK

1D
-3.51%
1M
6.42%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
-5.56%
1Y
58.98%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
10Y*

TSMG

1D
4.98%
1M
23.80%
YTD
94.33%
6M
108.01%
1Y
327.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARK vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-1.67%44.07%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
94.33%76.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and TSMG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.56

The correlation between TARK and TSMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TARK vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TARKTSMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

4.61

-3.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

3.97

-2.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.48

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

9.46

-8.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.19

30.96

-28.77

TARK vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the TSMG Sharpe Ratio of 4.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and TSMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TARKTSMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

4.61

-3.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

1.79

-1.86

Drawdowns

TARK vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and TSMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TARKTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-63.67%

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.57%

-35.29%

-22.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.30%

0.00%

-35.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-17.02%

-33.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.21%

10.79%

+18.42%

Volatility

TARK vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) is 17.93%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 22.57%. This indicates that TARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TARKTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.93%

22.57%

-4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.05%

54.92%

-4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.71%

71.57%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.60%

81.08%

+9.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.60%

81.08%

+9.52%

TARK vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TARK vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.51%, more than TSMG's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
30.51%30.00%0.59%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
5.91%11.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TARK and TSMG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMG has higher volatility (22.57%) compared to TARK (17.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs TSMG's -63.67%.

On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 327.45% vs 58.98% for TARK. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TARK has been the lower-risk option at 17.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 327.45% return vs 58.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 30.51%, compared with 5.91% for TSMG.

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.75% for TSMG.

TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.61 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TARK and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer