TARK vs. TSMG
TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TARK returned 58.98% vs 327.45% for TSMG. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TARK charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.
Performance
TARK vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 94.33% return.
TARK
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 58.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMG
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- 23.80%
- YTD
- 94.33%
- 6M
- 108.01%
- 1Y
- 327.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TARK vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -1.67% | 44.07% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 94.33% | 76.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between TARK and TSMG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between TARK and TSMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TARK vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank
TARK
TSMG
TARK vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TARK | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 4.61 | -3.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 3.97 | -2.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.48 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 9.46 | -8.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | 30.96 | -28.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TARK | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 4.61 | -3.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 1.79 | -1.86 |
Drawdowns
TARK vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and TSMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TARK | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -63.67% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.57% | -35.29% | -22.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.30% | 0.00% | -35.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -17.02% | -33.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.21% | 10.79% | +18.42% |
Volatility
TARK vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) is 17.93%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 22.57%. This indicates that TARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TARK | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.93% | 22.57% | -4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.05% | 54.92% | -4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.71% | 71.57% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.60% | 81.08% | +9.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.60% | 81.08% | +9.52% |
TARK vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TARK vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison
TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.51%, more than TSMG's 5.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 30.51% | 30.00% | 0.59% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 5.91% | 11.48% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TARK and TSMG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMG has higher volatility (22.57%) compared to TARK (17.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs TSMG's -63.67%.
On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 327.45% vs 58.98% for TARK. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TARK has been the lower-risk option at 17.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 327.45% return vs 58.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.
TARK has the higher dividend yield at 30.51%, compared with 5.91% for TSMG.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.75% for TSMG.
TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.61 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TARK and TSMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer