TARK vs. RINC
Compare and contrast key facts about Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC).
TARK and RINC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TARK is an actively managed fund by AXS. It was launched on Apr 28, 2022. RINC is a passively managed fund by AXS that tracks the performance of the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2023.
Performance
TARK vs. RINC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TARK vs. RINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -25.67% | 41.00% | -4.85% | 50.52% |
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF | 0.00% | 7.75% | -5.74% | 1.71% |
Returns By Period
TARK
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -16.90%
- YTD
- -25.67%
- 6M
- -44.98%
- 1Y
- 59.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RINC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TARK vs. RINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than RINC's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TARK vs. RINC — Risk / Return Rank
TARK
RINC
TARK vs. RINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TARK | RINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TARK | RINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between TARK and RINC is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TARK vs. RINC - Dividend Comparison
TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.35%, more than RINC's 3.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 40.35% | 30.00% | 0.59% | 0.00% |
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF | 3.60% | 6.04% | 10.85% | 3.88% |
Drawdowns
TARK vs. RINC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TARK | RINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.09% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.46% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.59% | — | — |
Volatility
TARK vs. RINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TARK | RINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.33% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.51% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.51% | — | — |