TARK vs. RINC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and RINC (AXS Real Estate Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TARK is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while RINC is a REIT fund tracking the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index. TARK is actively managed, while RINC is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TARK charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RINC.

Performance

TARK vs. RINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TARK

• 1D: -4.26%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: -5.86%
• 6M: -15.22%
• 1Y: 48.05%
• 3Y*: 20.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RINC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARK vs. RINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF	-5.86%	41.00%	-4.85%	50.52%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	0.00%	7.75%	-5.74%	1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and RINC is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023	0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between TARK and RINC has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TARK vs. RINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK

TARK Risk / Return Rank: 21
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. RINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TARK	RINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TARK	RINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TARK	RINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.05%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.98%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.31%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TARK	RINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.80%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.58%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.58%	—	—

TARK vs. RINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than RINC's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

TARK vs. RINC - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.86%, more than RINC's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	2.16%	6.04%	10.85%	3.88%
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF	31.86%	30.00%	0.59%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TARK and RINC in my portfolio?

TARK and RINC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TARK or RINC?

On fees, RINC is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TARK or RINC?

RINC is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TARK or RINC?

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 31.86%, compared with 2.16% for RINC.

What is the main difference between TARK and RINC?

TARK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RINC is REIT. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.89% for RINC.