TARK vs. NVDS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TARK is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while NVDS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%). TARK is actively managed, while NVDS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TARK returned 18.03%/yr vs -62.36%/yr for NVDS. At a correlation of -0.52, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.

Performance

TARK vs. NVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly higher than NVDS's -18.53% return.

TARK

• 1D: -4.11%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: -10.45%
• 6M: -18.36%
• 1Y: 1.64%
• 3Y*: 18.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDS

• 1D: 6.24%
• 1M: 8.67%
• YTD: -18.53%
• 6M: -16.59%
• 1Y: -47.95%
• 3Y*: -62.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARK vs. NVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF	-10.45%	41.00%	-4.85%	121.37%	-59.57%
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	-18.53%	-58.18%	-80.03%	-83.15%	-16.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and NVDS is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	-0.52

The correlation between TARK and NVDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.52 to -0.47 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TARK vs. NVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK

TARK Risk / Return Rank: 10
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 12
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 9

NVDS

NVDS Risk / Return Rank: 2
NVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
NVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 2
NVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. NVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TARK	NVDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	-0.90	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	-1.31	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.85	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	-0.85	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.05	-1.41	+1.46

TARK vs. NVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the NVDS Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and NVDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TARK vs. NVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, smaller than the maximum NVDS drawdown of -99.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and NVDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TARK	NVDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.82%	-99.40%	+21.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.57%	-56.48%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.55%	-95.90%	+30.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.07%	-99.25%	+58.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.80%	-83.59%	+32.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.71%	36.37%	-5.66%

Volatility

TARK vs. NVDS - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 24.92% compared to Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) at 20.03%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TARK	NVDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.92%	20.03%	+4.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.17%	40.67%	+12.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.40%	53.16%	+18.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.67%	68.89%	+21.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.67%	68.89%	+21.78%

TARK vs. NVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TARK and NVDS have an expense ratio of 1.15%.

Dividends

TARK vs. NVDS - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.49%, more than NVDS's 17.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	17.42%	14.19%	14.11%	14.69%	5.72%
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF	33.49%	30.00%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TARK and NVDS in my portfolio?

TARK and NVDS have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TARK or NVDS?

TARK has higher volatility (24.92%) compared to NVDS (20.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs NVDS's -99.40%.

Which ETF is better, TARK or NVDS?

On 3-year performance, TARK leads with 18.03% vs -62.36% for NVDS. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDS has been the lower-risk option at 20.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TARK or NVDS?

Over the 3-year period, TARK has performed better with a 18.03% return vs -62.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TARK or NVDS?

TARK and NVDS have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TARK or NVDS?

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 33.49%, compared with 17.42% for NVDS.

What is the main difference between TARK and NVDS?

TARK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDS is Inverse Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.