TARK vs. NVDS
TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TARK is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while NVDS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%). TARK is actively managed, while NVDS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TARK returned 22.58%/yr vs -65.20%/yr for NVDS. At a correlation of -0.52, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.
Performance
TARK vs. NVDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly higher than NVDS's -29.31% return.
TARK
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 58.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDS
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -17.63%
- YTD
- -29.31%
- 6M
- -32.74%
- 1Y
- -58.02%
- 3Y*
- -65.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TARK vs. NVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -1.67% | 41.00% | -4.85% | 121.37% | -57.90% |
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -29.31% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -83.15% | -14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TARK and NVDS is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | -0.52 |
The correlation between TARK and NVDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.52 to -0.43 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TARK vs. NVDS — Risk / Return Rank
TARK
NVDS
TARK vs. NVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TARK | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | -1.14 | +1.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | -1.91 | +3.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.79 | +0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | -0.97 | +2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | -1.53 | +3.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TARK | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | -1.14 | +1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | -1.03 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
TARK vs. NVDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, smaller than the maximum NVDS drawdown of -99.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and NVDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TARK | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -99.40% | +21.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.57% | -59.88% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.55% | -96.32% | +30.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.30% | -99.35% | +64.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -83.38% | +32.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.21% | 38.60% | -9.39% |
Volatility
TARK vs. NVDS - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) have volatilities of 17.93% and 18.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TARK | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.93% | 18.32% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.05% | 38.28% | +11.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.71% | 50.88% | +20.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.60% | 68.85% | +21.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.60% | 68.85% | +21.75% |
TARK vs. NVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TARK and NVDS have an expense ratio of 1.15%.
Dividends
TARK vs. NVDS - Dividend Comparison
TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.51%, more than NVDS's 20.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 20.07% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 30.51% | 30.00% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TARK and NVDS have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDS has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to TARK (17.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs NVDS's -99.40%.
On 3-year performance, TARK leads with 22.58% vs -65.20% for NVDS. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, TARK has been the lower-risk option at 17.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TARK has performed better with a 22.58% return vs -65.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TARK and NVDS have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.
TARK has the higher dividend yield at 30.51%, compared with 20.07% for NVDS.
TARK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDS is Inverse Equities.
TARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TARK and NVDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer