PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TARK vs. MQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TARK vs. MQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than MQQQ's 27.22% return.


TARK

1D
-4.11%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-10.45%
6M
-18.36%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
10Y*

MQQQ

1D
-6.32%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
27.22%
6M
23.93%
1Y
62.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARK vs. MQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-10.45%41.00%49.19%
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
27.22%31.67%16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and MQQQ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2024

0.78

The correlation between TARK and MQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TARK vs. MQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. MQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TARKMQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.30

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

2.50

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.05

8.74

-8.69

TARK vs. MQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the MQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and MQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TARK vs. MQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than MQQQ's maximum drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and MQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TARKMQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-42.16%

-35.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.57%

-25.23%

-32.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.07%

-8.68%

-32.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.80%

-7.16%

-43.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.71%

7.20%

+23.51%

Volatility

TARK vs. MQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 24.92% compared to Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) at 17.78%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TARKMQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.92%

17.78%

+7.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.17%

29.02%

+24.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.40%

35.95%

+35.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.67%

44.41%

+46.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.67%

44.41%

+46.26%

TARK vs. MQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MQQQ's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TARK vs. MQQQ - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.49%, more than MQQQ's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
1.58%2.02%0.02%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
33.49%30.00%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


TARK and MQQQ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TARK has higher volatility (24.92%) compared to MQQQ (17.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs MQQQ's -42.16%.

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 62.78% vs 1.64% for TARK. On fees, TARK is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 17.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 62.78% return vs 1.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TARK is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 33.49%, compared with 1.58% for MQQQ.

Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 1.30% for MQQQ.

MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TARK and MQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer