TARK vs. ERX
TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TARK is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while ERX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index (200%). TARK is actively managed, while ERX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TARK returned 1.19%/yr vs 17.67%/yr for ERX. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TARK charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for ERX.
Performance
TARK vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -24.46% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 71.01% return.
TARK
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -24.19%
- 6M
- -18.59%
- YTD
- -24.46%
- 1Y
- -18.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.86%
ERX
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 23.93%
- 6M
- 32.46%
- YTD
- 71.01%
- 1Y
- 85.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 35.70%
- 10Y*
- -8.11%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $22.14M | $22.35M | $28.47M | |
| $604.81K | $641.97K | $710.94K |
TARK vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -24.46% | 41.00% | -4.85% | 121.37% | -71.31% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 71.01% | 2.79% | 1.09% | -12.26% | 27.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between TARK and ERX is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2022 | 0.15 |
The correlation between TARK and ERX shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TARK vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
TARK
ERX
TARK vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TARK | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.29 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 2.65 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 6.74 | -7.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TARK vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TARK | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -99.54% | +21.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.57% | -29.97% | -27.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.55% | -42.34% | -23.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.30% | -91.37% | +41.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.55% | -67.24% | +16.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.47% | 11.83% | +21.64% |
Volatility
TARK vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 20.33% compared to Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) at 11.87%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TARK | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.33% | 11.87% | +8.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.18% | 33.76% | +21.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.66% | 42.31% | +30.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.17% | 51.50% | +38.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.17% | 68.84% | +21.33% |
TARK vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ERX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
TARK vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.71%, more than ERX's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.49% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 39.71% | 30.00% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TARK and ERX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TARK has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to ERX (11.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs ERX's -99.54%.
On 3-year performance, ERX leads with 17.67% vs 1.19% for TARK. On fees, ERX is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, ERX has been the lower-risk option at 11.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ERX has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 1.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ERX is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.
TARK has the higher dividend yield at 39.71%, compared with 1.49% for ERX.
TARK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ERX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.91% for ERX.
ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TARK and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer