PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAP-A vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAP-A vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP-A) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAP-A achieves a -7.87% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TAP-A has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -5.93%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


TAP-A

1D
-7.69%
1M
2.51%
YTD
-7.87%
6M
-15.75%
1Y
-16.00%
3Y*
-11.59%
5Y*
-3.53%
10Y*
-5.93%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAP-A vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAP-A
Molson Coors Beverage Company
-7.87%-15.84%-8.93%-13.73%36.05%-6.40%-3.09%9.18%-24.67%-12.69%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TAP-A and VOO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.12

The correlation between TAP-A and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAP-A vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAP-A
TAP-A Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TAP-A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAP-A Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAP-A Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TAP-A Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAP-A Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAP-A vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP-A) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAP-AVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.39

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

3.02

-3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

13.58

-14.96

TAP-A vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAP-A Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAP-A and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAP-A vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAP-A drawdown since its inception was -68.56%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAP-A and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAP-AVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.56%

-33.99%

-34.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.27%

-8.90%

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.63%

-18.69%

-18.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.50%

-24.52%

-20.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.32%

-33.99%

-24.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.74%

-1.74%

-50.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-3.68%

-31.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.62%

1.98%

+9.64%

Volatility

TAP-A vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP-A) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that TAP-A's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAP-AVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.24%

4.60%

+7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.49%

9.73%

+19.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.27%

12.39%

+21.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.98%

16.90%

+22.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.33%

18.05%

+26.28%

Dividends

TAP-A vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

TAP-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TAP-A
Molson Coors Beverage Company
4.52%4.04%3.07%2.53%1.97%1.17%0.91%3.00%2.65%1.95%1.67%1.75%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAP-A and VOO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAP-A has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAP-A dropped -68.56% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAP-A and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer