TAP-A vs. VOO
TAP-A (Molson Coors Beverage Company) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, TAP-A returned -6.49%/yr vs 15.29%/yr for VOO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TAP-A vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAP-A achieves a -11.58% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.31% return. Over the past 10 years, TAP-A has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -6.49%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.29% annualized return.
TAP-A
- 1D
- -14.81%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- 6M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -11.58%
- 1Y
- -23.47%
- 3Y*
- -12.56%
- 5Y*
- -5.99%
- 10Y*
- -6.49%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 1Y
- 22.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 15.29%
TAP-A vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAP-A Molson Coors Beverage Company | -11.58% | -15.84% | -8.93% | -13.73% | 36.05% | -6.40% | -3.09% | 9.18% | -24.67% | -12.69% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.31% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAP-A and VOO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.12 |
The correlation between TAP-A and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAP-A vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
TAP-A
VOO
TAP-A vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP-A) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAP-A | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.32 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 2.49 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | 10.85 | -12.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAP-A vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAP-A drawdown since its inception was -68.56%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAP-A and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAP-A | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.56% | -33.99% | -34.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.47% | -8.90% | -17.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.63% | -18.69% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.38% | -24.52% | -21.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.32% | -33.99% | -24.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.68% | -0.34% | -53.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.98% | -3.68% | -31.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.08% | 2.04% | +10.04% |
Volatility
TAP-A vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP-A) has a higher volatility of 21.67% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.42%. This indicates that TAP-A's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAP-A | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.67% | 4.42% | +17.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.23% | 9.94% | +24.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.04% | 12.48% | +26.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.68% | 16.92% | +22.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.70% | 17.99% | +26.71% |
Dividends
TAP-A vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
TAP-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than VOO's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAP-A Molson Coors Beverage Company | 4.71% | 4.04% | 3.07% | 2.53% | 1.97% | 1.17% | 0.91% | 3.00% | 2.65% | 1.95% | 1.67% | 1.75% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAP-A and VOO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAP-A has higher volatility (21.67%) compared to VOO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAP-A dropped -68.56% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAP-A and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer