TAN vs. QQQ
TAN (Invesco Solar ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MAC Global Solar Energy Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TAN returned 13.50%/yr vs 21.94%/yr for QQQ. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TAN charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
TAN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAN achieves a 43.10% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, TAN has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.50%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.
TAN
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- 20.40%
- YTD
- 43.10%
- 6M
- 48.35%
- 1Y
- 112.42%
- 3Y*
- -0.64%
- 5Y*
- -1.65%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
TAN vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 43.10% | 48.31% | -37.61% | -26.79% | -5.24% | -25.10% | 233.96% | 66.53% | -25.67% | 54.38% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAN and QQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2008 | 0.56 |
The correlation between TAN and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TAN vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TAN
QQQ
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
TAN
QQQ
Utilities
TAN
QQQ
Technology
TAN
QQQ
Financial Services
TAN
QQQ
Industrials
TAN
QQQ
Basic Materials
TAN
-
QQQ
Communication Services
TAN
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
TAN
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
TAN
-
QQQ
Healthcare
TAN
-
QQQ
Real Estate
TAN
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAN vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TAN
QQQ
TAN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAN | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.05 | 2.64 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.62 | 3.45 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.30 | 3.51 | +4.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.09 | 13.49 | +6.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAN | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05 | 2.64 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.81 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.99 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.41 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
TAN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAN drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAN and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAN | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.29% | -82.97% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -11.96% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.40% | -22.77% | -41.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.95% | -35.12% | -38.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.53% | -35.12% | -43.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.72% | -0.26% | -67.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.51% | -32.79% | -45.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.62% | 3.11% | +2.51% |
Volatility
TAN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that TAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAN | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.15% | 4.49% | +7.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.32% | 12.10% | +13.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.29% | 15.94% | +21.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.74% | 22.38% | +17.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.98% | 22.29% | +15.69% |
TAN vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAN has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
TAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.69% | 1.77% | 5.04% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAN and QQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAN has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAN dropped -95.29% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs 13.50% for TAN. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TAN.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for TAN.
TAN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. TAN tracks MAC Global Solar Energy Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TAN and 0.18% for QQQ.
TAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAN and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer