TAN vs. EILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX).
TAN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. It was launched on Apr 15, 2008. EILGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002.
Performance
TAN vs. EILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TAN vs. EILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 14.56% | 48.31% | -37.61% | -26.79% | -5.24% | -25.10% | 233.96% | 66.53% | -25.67% | 54.38% |
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | -10.39% | 10.85% | 10.63% | 25.66% | -20.27% | 30.41% | 27.18% | 38.37% | 8.31% | 27.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAN achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than EILGX's -10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, TAN has underperformed EILGX with an annualized return of 10.44%, while EILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.59% annualized return.
TAN
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 6M
- 24.82%
- 1Y
- 82.69%
- 3Y*
- -10.00%
- 5Y*
- -9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
EILGX
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -9.24%
- 1Y
- -0.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAN vs. EILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAN has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than EILGX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TAN vs. EILGX — Risk / Return Rank
TAN
EILGX
TAN vs. EILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAN | EILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | -0.04 | +2.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 0.05 | +2.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.01 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.21 | 0.00 | +5.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 0.01 | +13.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAN | EILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | -0.04 | +2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.40 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.76 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 0.45 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between TAN and EILGX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TAN vs. EILGX - Dividend Comparison
TAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.17%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.69% | 1.77% | 5.04% | 1.60% |
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | 17.17% | 15.39% | 4.34% | 0.57% | 0.32% | 2.18% | 0.62% | 0.17% | 19.72% | 54.05% | 17.75% | 23.15% |
Drawdowns
TAN vs. EILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAN drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than EILGX's maximum drawdown of -51.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAN and EILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAN | EILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.29% | -51.01% | -44.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.25% | -14.90% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.95% | -27.35% | -46.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.53% | -30.85% | -47.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.16% | -12.36% | -61.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.57% | -7.09% | -71.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 4.37% | +1.78% |
Volatility
TAN vs. EILGX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a higher volatility of 10.07% compared to Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) at 4.73%. This indicates that TAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TAN | EILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 4.73% | +5.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 9.07% | +17.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.51% | 16.07% | +23.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.82% | 16.71% | +23.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.78% | 17.87% | +19.91% |