EILGX vs. FAGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX).
EILGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002. FAGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995.
Performance
EILGX vs. FAGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EILGX vs. FAGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | -10.39% | 10.85% | 10.63% | 25.66% | -20.27% | 30.41% | 27.18% | 38.37% | 8.31% | 27.41% |
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | -9.48% | 22.47% | 39.06% | 45.51% | -32.60% | 16.63% | 74.20% | 47.51% | 19.08% | 37.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EILGX achieves a -10.39% return, which is significantly lower than FAGCX's -9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, EILGX has underperformed FAGCX with an annualized return of 13.59%, while FAGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.70% annualized return.
EILGX
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -9.24%
- 1Y
- -0.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
FAGCX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EILGX vs. FAGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EILGX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FAGCX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EILGX vs. FAGCX — Risk / Return Rank
EILGX
FAGCX
EILGX vs. FAGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EILGX | FAGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | 1.00 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.05 | 1.53 | -1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.22 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 1.48 | -1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 5.36 | -5.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EILGX | FAGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 1.00 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.93 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.48 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between EILGX and FAGCX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EILGX vs. FAGCX - Dividend Comparison
EILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.17%, more than FAGCX's 4.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | 17.17% | 15.39% | 4.34% | 0.57% | 0.32% | 2.18% | 0.62% | 0.17% | 19.72% | 54.05% | 17.75% | 23.15% |
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | 4.05% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.34% | 14.14% | 7.31% | 7.69% | 14.30% | 8.00% | 15.78% | 16.11% |
Drawdowns
EILGX vs. FAGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EILGX drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, smaller than the maximum FAGCX drawdown of -69.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EILGX and FAGCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EILGX | FAGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.01% | -69.09% | +18.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -16.10% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.35% | -38.72% | +11.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.85% | -38.72% | +7.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.36% | -12.10% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -18.84% | +11.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 4.46% | -0.09% |
Volatility
EILGX vs. FAGCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) is 4.73%, while Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that EILGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EILGX | FAGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 8.51% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 14.81% | -5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 24.42% | -8.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 25.44% | -8.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 24.42% | -6.55% |