EILGX vs. FGTAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX).
EILGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002. FGTAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 5, 2008.
Performance
EILGX vs. FGTAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EILGX vs. FGTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | -11.94% | 10.85% | 10.63% | 25.66% | -20.27% | 30.41% | 27.18% | 38.37% | 8.31% | 27.41% |
FGTAX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A | -5.15% | 26.58% | 25.62% | 26.18% | -9.26% | 25.98% | 12.59% | 30.74% | -7.68% | 17.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EILGX achieves a -11.94% return, which is significantly lower than FGTAX's -5.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EILGX has underperformed FGTAX with an annualized return of 13.40%, while FGTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.76% annualized return.
EILGX
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 6M
- -9.95%
- 1Y
- -2.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
FGTAX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -5.15%
- 6M
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- 22.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EILGX vs. FGTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EILGX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FGTAX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EILGX vs. FGTAX — Risk / Return Rank
EILGX
FGTAX
EILGX vs. FGTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EILGX | FGTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | 1.28 | -1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | 1.84 | -1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.30 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 1.71 | -1.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 7.97 | -8.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EILGX | FGTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 1.28 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.86 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.82 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.55 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between EILGX and FGTAX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EILGX vs. FGTAX - Dividend Comparison
EILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.48%, more than FGTAX's 3.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | 17.48% | 15.39% | 4.34% | 0.57% | 0.32% | 2.18% | 0.62% | 0.17% | 19.72% | 54.05% | 17.75% | 23.15% |
FGTAX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A | 3.92% | 3.72% | 2.48% | 1.86% | 4.17% | 4.61% | 7.84% | 12.91% | 21.65% | 16.21% | 1.75% | 3.75% |
Drawdowns
EILGX vs. FGTAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EILGX drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, roughly equal to the maximum FGTAX drawdown of -53.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EILGX and FGTAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EILGX | FGTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.01% | -53.07% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -12.16% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.35% | -23.48% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.85% | -35.21% | +4.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.88% | -9.04% | -4.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -6.83% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 2.61% | +1.69% |
Volatility
EILGX vs. FGTAX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) have volatilities of 4.23% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EILGX | FGTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 4.35% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 9.25% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 18.15% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 16.65% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 18.09% | -0.22% |