TAMBX vs. SVBAX
TAMBX (JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund) and SVBAX (John Hancock Balanced Fund) are both mutual funds - TAMBX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by John Hancock, while SVBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, TAMBX returned 1.93%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for SVBAX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAMBX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for SVBAX.
Performance
TAMBX vs. SVBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAMBX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than SVBAX's 10.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TAMBX has underperformed SVBAX with an annualized return of 1.93%, while SVBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.
TAMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 6.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
SVBAX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
TAMBX vs. SVBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAMBX JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund | 1.52% | 5.25% | 2.23% | 5.36% | -10.18% | 3.05% | 4.07% | 8.16% | 0.14% | 5.48% |
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund | 10.21% | 15.69% | 13.31% | 18.22% | -15.79% | 14.49% | 15.97% | 21.28% | -5.02% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAMBX and SVBAX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1993 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, TAMBX and SVBAX have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAMBX vs. SVBAX — Risk / Return Rank
TAMBX
SVBAX
TAMBX vs. SVBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund (TAMBX) and John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAMBX | SVBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.50 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 4.19 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 20.09 | -12.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAMBX vs. SVBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAMBX drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum SVBAX drawdown of -40.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAMBX and SVBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAMBX | SVBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.00% | -40.81% | +25.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -5.57% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.65% | -12.06% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.73% | -20.53% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.73% | -21.00% | +6.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.34% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -5.23% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 1.16% | -0.25% |
Volatility
TAMBX vs. SVBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund (TAMBX) is 0.67%, while John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that TAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAMBX | SVBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 3.39% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.88% | 7.03% | -5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49% | 8.71% | -6.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.82% | 10.86% | -7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 10.83% | -6.81% |
TAMBX vs. SVBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAMBX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than SVBAX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAMBX vs. SVBAX - Dividend Comparison
TAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than SVBAX's 10.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund | 10.92% | 12.45% | 3.72% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 2.73% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 8.06% | 3.51% | 1.70% | 4.57% |
TAMBX JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund | 3.59% | 4.39% | 3.10% | 2.39% | 2.47% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 3.37% | 3.69% | 3.68% | 3.79% | 3.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAMBX and SVBAX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVBAX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to TAMBX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAMBX dropped -15.00% vs SVBAX's -40.81%.
SVBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAMBX and SVBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer