PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAMBX vs. JFIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAMBX vs. JFIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund (TAMBX) and John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAMBX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than JFIVX's 10.02% return.


TAMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.42%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.05%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
1.98%

JFIVX

1D
1.08%
1M
0.43%
YTD
10.02%
6M
9.52%
1Y
26.84%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAMBX vs. JFIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAMBX
JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund
1.52%5.25%2.23%5.36%-10.18%3.05%4.07%8.16%0.14%5.04%
JFIVX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust
10.02%17.54%24.61%25.92%-18.30%28.31%18.03%31.05%-5.00%17.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TAMBX and JFIVX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.04

The correlation between TAMBX and JFIVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAMBX vs. JFIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAMBX
TAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

JFIVX
JFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAMBX vs. JFIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund (TAMBX) and John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAMBXJFIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.39

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.02

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

13.67

-6.46

TAMBX vs. JFIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the JFIVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAMBX and JFIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAMBX vs. JFIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAMBX drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum JFIVX drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAMBX and JFIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAMBXJFIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.00%

-33.81%

+18.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-8.94%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.65%

-18.82%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.73%

-24.67%

+9.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-1.38%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-4.61%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.97%

-1.07%

Volatility

TAMBX vs. JFIVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund (TAMBX) is 0.66%, while John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that TAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JFIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAMBXJFIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

4.76%

-4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

9.88%

-8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48%

12.56%

-10.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.81%

16.65%

-12.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

18.35%

-14.33%

TAMBX vs. JFIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAMBX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than JFIVX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAMBX vs. JFIVX - Dividend Comparison

TAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than JFIVX's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JFIVX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust
2.32%2.56%2.19%2.44%5.19%5.17%3.38%2.97%2.90%1.27%0.00%0.00%
TAMBX
JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund
3.59%4.39%3.10%2.39%2.47%2.61%2.82%3.37%3.69%3.68%3.79%3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAMBX and JFIVX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JFIVX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to TAMBX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAMBX dropped -15.00% vs JFIVX's -33.81%.

TAMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAMBX and JFIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer