TAIL vs. SMLV
TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) and SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. TAIL is actively managed, while SMLV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TAIL returned -8.38%/yr vs 7.75%/yr for SMLV. At a correlation of -0.52, they often move in opposite directions. TAIL charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SMLV.
Performance
TAIL vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAIL achieves a -6.17% return, which is significantly lower than SMLV's 12.88% return.
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -5.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
SMLV
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
TAIL vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -6.17% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.70% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 12.88% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | -1.55% | 24.10% | -6.62% | 4.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAIL and SMLV is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | -0.52 |
The correlation between TAIL and SMLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.52 (all time) to -0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TAIL vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TAIL
SMLV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
TAIL
SMLV
Financial Services
TAIL
SMLV
Communication Services
TAIL
SMLV
Consumer Cyclical
TAIL
SMLV
Healthcare
TAIL
SMLV
Industrials
TAIL
SMLV
Consumer Defensive
TAIL
SMLV
Energy
TAIL
SMLV
Utilities
TAIL
SMLV
Real Estate
TAIL
SMLV
Basic Materials
TAIL
SMLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAIL vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank
TAIL
SMLV
TAIL vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAIL | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.26 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 3.00 | -3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.01 | 8.20 | -10.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAIL | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.03 | 1.40 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 | 0.43 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.54 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
TAIL vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAIL drawdown since its inception was -52.36%, which is greater than SMLV's maximum drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIL and SMLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAIL | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.36% | -42.45% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -7.34% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.65% | -20.40% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.44% | -20.40% | -18.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.56% | -1.48% | -50.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -5.46% | -23.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 2.68% | +1.67% |
Volatility
TAIL vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) is 0.86%, while SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that TAIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAIL | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 3.98% | -3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.45% | 9.88% | -3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.51% | 15.73% | -7.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 18.28% | -3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 20.95% | -6.01% |
TAIL vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAIL vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison
TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than SMLV's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.35% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.49% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAIL and SMLV have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMLV has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAIL dropped -52.36% vs SMLV's -42.45%.
On 5-year performance, SMLV leads with 7.75% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 7.75% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.
TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.35% for SMLV.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TAIL and 0.12% for SMLV.
SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAIL and SMLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer