PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAIL vs. SMLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAIL vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAIL achieves a -6.17% return, which is significantly lower than SMLV's 12.88% return.


TAIL

1D
-0.05%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
-6.17%
6M
-7.55%
1Y
-8.73%
3Y*
-5.76%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*

SMLV

1D
-1.48%
1M
1.39%
YTD
12.88%
6M
12.84%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAIL vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
-6.17%5.48%-9.62%-13.29%-13.13%-12.81%6.91%-14.27%2.85%-7.70%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
12.88%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%4.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TAIL and SMLV is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

-0.52

The correlation between TAIL and SMLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.52 (all time) to -0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TAIL vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TAIL
SMLV

Technology

35.6%
11.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
30.5%

Communication Services

11.2%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.7%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.7%

Industrials

8.3%
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.3%

Energy

3.5%
1.8%

Utilities

2.4%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
12.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.2%

Technology

TAIL
35.6%
SMLV
11.2%

Financial Services

TAIL
11.8%
SMLV
30.5%

Communication Services

TAIL
11.2%
SMLV
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TAIL
10.1%
SMLV
8.7%

Healthcare

TAIL
8.5%
SMLV
8.7%

Industrials

TAIL
8.3%
SMLV
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

TAIL
4.9%
SMLV
4.3%

Energy

TAIL
3.5%
SMLV
1.8%

Utilities

TAIL
2.4%
SMLV
2.9%

Real Estate

TAIL
1.9%
SMLV
12.2%

Basic Materials

TAIL
1.8%
SMLV
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAIL vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAIL
TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAIL vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAILSMLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.26

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

3.00

-3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.01

8.20

-10.21

TAIL vs. SMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAIL Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the SMLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAIL and SMLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAILSMLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.03

1.40

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.57

0.43

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

0.54

-1.03

Drawdowns

TAIL vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAIL drawdown since its inception was -52.36%, which is greater than SMLV's maximum drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIL and SMLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAILSMLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.36%

-42.45%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-7.34%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-20.40%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

-20.40%

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.56%

-1.48%

-50.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.12%

-5.46%

-23.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

2.68%

+1.67%

Volatility

TAIL vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) is 0.86%, while SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that TAIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAILSMLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

3.98%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

9.88%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.51%

15.73%

-7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

18.28%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.94%

20.95%

-6.01%

TAIL vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAIL vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison

TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than SMLV's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.35%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
3.49%2.88%3.48%3.74%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAIL and SMLV have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAIL dropped -52.36% vs SMLV's -42.45%.

On 5-year performance, SMLV leads with 7.75% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 7.75% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.

TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.35% for SMLV.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TAIL and 0.12% for SMLV.

SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAIL and SMLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer