TAIL vs. GVAL
TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAIL is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund actively managed by Cambria, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TAIL returned -8.38%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for GVAL. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. TAIL charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
TAIL vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAIL achieves a -6.17% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 14.37% return.
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -5.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
GVAL
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
TAIL vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -6.17% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.70% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 14.37% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 10.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAIL and GVAL is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | -0.45 |
The correlation between TAIL and GVAL shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (all time) to -0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TAIL vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TAIL
GVAL
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
TAIL
GVAL
Financial Services
TAIL
GVAL
Communication Services
TAIL
GVAL
Consumer Cyclical
TAIL
GVAL
Healthcare
TAIL
GVAL
-
Industrials
TAIL
GVAL
Consumer Defensive
TAIL
GVAL
Energy
TAIL
GVAL
Utilities
TAIL
GVAL
Real Estate
TAIL
GVAL
Basic Materials
TAIL
GVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAIL vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
TAIL
GVAL
TAIL vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAIL | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.49 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 3.47 | -4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.01 | 13.33 | -15.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAIL | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.03 | 2.75 | -3.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 | 0.72 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.35 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
TAIL vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAIL drawdown since its inception was -52.36%, which is greater than GVAL's maximum drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIL and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAIL | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.36% | -46.82% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -11.50% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.65% | -15.72% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.44% | -30.83% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.56% | -1.24% | -50.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -13.88% | -15.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 2.99% | +1.36% |
Volatility
TAIL vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) is 0.86%, while Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that TAIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAIL | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 5.10% | -4.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.45% | 12.72% | -6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.51% | 14.52% | -6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 18.46% | -3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 19.21% | -4.27% |
TAIL vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAIL vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than GVAL's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.83% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.49% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAIL and GVAL have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVAL has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAIL dropped -52.36% vs GVAL's -46.82%.
On 5-year performance, GVAL leads with 13.14% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, TAIL is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 13.14% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAIL is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.
TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.83% for GVAL.
TAIL is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while GVAL is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TAIL and 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAIL and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer