TAGRX vs. JVMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX).
TAGRX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 1, 1984. JVMIX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jun 2, 1997.
Performance
TAGRX vs. JVMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TAGRX vs. JVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | -8.29% | 9.98% | 21.14% | 32.23% | -24.86% | 29.16% | 20.55% | 35.06% | -14.09% | 19.63% |
JVMIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I | 1.16% | 11.28% | 10.46% | 16.64% | -7.09% | 26.85% | 5.90% | 30.13% | -14.90% | 15.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGRX achieves a -8.29% return, which is significantly lower than JVMIX's 1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TAGRX has outperformed JVMIX with an annualized return of 11.59%, while JVMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.12% annualized return.
TAGRX
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- YTD
- -8.29%
- 6M
- -6.58%
- 1Y
- 7.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
JVMIX
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAGRX vs. JVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGRX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than JVMIX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TAGRX vs. JVMIX — Risk / Return Rank
TAGRX
JVMIX
TAGRX vs. JVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAGRX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.80 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.25 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.17 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 1.16 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 4.73 | -2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAGRX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.80 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.45 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.50 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.29 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGRX and JVMIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TAGRX vs. JVMIX - Dividend Comparison
TAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.18%, more than JVMIX's 9.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | 13.18% | 12.09% | 13.00% | 6.67% | 6.76% | 7.82% | 0.30% | 0.53% | 14.05% | 8.22% | 2.96% | 1.22% |
JVMIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I | 9.13% | 9.24% | 12.05% | 4.02% | 5.27% | 6.67% | 1.13% | 2.40% | 13.85% | 5.94% | 1.91% | 5.88% |
Drawdowns
TAGRX vs. JVMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, smaller than the maximum JVMIX drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGRX and JVMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGRX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -67.04% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.04% | -13.22% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.10% | -21.13% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.96% | -42.64% | +5.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.64% | -6.93% | -4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.57% | -13.43% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 3.23% | +0.90% |
Volatility
TAGRX vs. JVMIX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) at 4.40%. This indicates that TAGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TAGRX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 4.40% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 9.77% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 18.11% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 18.44% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 20.31% | +0.19% |